Redstone Government Consulting Blog | Accounting System Compliance (4)

On November 26, 2025, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issued the 2025 Compliance Supplement. The Supplement outlines the compliance requirements to assist auditors in understanding the Federal program’s objectives, procedures and requirements when performing a Single audit for fiscal years beginning after June 30, 2024. The Compliance Supplement is normally issued in the spring of each year; however, OMB delayed its issuance to incorporate significant updates to 2 CFR 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, in October 2024. In order to assist auditors with the different requirements, Part 3 Compliance Requirements of the Supplement was divided into two Parts for audit testing as follows:

• Part 3.1 for awards subject to 2 CFR 200 prior to October 2024 and
• Part 3.2 for awards after October 1, 2024

Closing out the year is an important step in your accounting cycle, and it should involve more than just “closing the books.” For government contractors, year-end is about ensuring your financials are accurate, compliant, and audit-ready, not just for tax purposes, but to support ongoing contract and regulatory requirements.

On October 21, 2025, the Small Business Administration (SBA) released a state-level analysis or estimate of the impact of a government shutdown on small business lending. The shutdown has frozen the SBA’s core 7(a) and 504 small-business lending programs. These lending programs are designed to support small businesses’ access to funds to acquire or improve long-term fixed assets such as real estate, machinery, and equipment.

Implementing any new ERP system is no small task. As you probably know, Deltek Costpoint is a complex system. Complex doesn’t have to mean complicated. No need to stress. This is where a strong implementation partner and a strong internal implementation team play an important role. What drives the success of an implementation? Detailed planning, effective communication, training, hands-on testing, data reconciliations, and a commitment by company personnel to see the project through every “first” after go-live.

Government contracting entails unique accounting requirements that go far beyond basic bookkeeping. There are compliance rules, complex cost pools, and sometimes razor-thin margins, which means the stakes are too high for “good enough.” Errors in cost allocation, indirect rates, or contract setup can create audit findings, repayment demands, or unexpected losses, yet hiring an in-house controller or CFO with the right expertise can be costly and difficult to justify for many small and mid-sized firms.

Custom reporting is something that every organization wants, but the investment can be overwhelming. It requires significant resources, including staff time and an administrative budget. Not only does the investment feel like a lot, but it can also be overwhelming just to consider what your organization really needs from a custom reporting environment. Typically, an organization using Unanet would consult a professional specializing in Power BI reporting or Analytics Studio. But does it have to be so complicated and so expensive?

If you have any grants or cooperative agreements (i.e., federal awards under 2 CFR 200), you must annually determine whether you must obtain an audit, as required by 2 CFR Subpart F. These are referred to as “Single Audits.” And yes, even if you get audited by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) or one of its hired Independent Public Accountants (IPAs) for your FAR-based contract or subcontracts, if you have a grant, you will need a second audit.

Government contractors deal with a unique set of rules when it comes to expenses. FAR Part 31 lays out the specific guidelines on what you can and cannot charge to the government. If unallowable costs slip through, you could face compliance problems or see expenses disallowed in an audit.

We knew this was coming based on the June 30, 2025, PF 2025-38 (FAL 2025-05) Implementation of Indirect and Fringe Benefits Cost Reimbursement Limits on Financial Assistance Awards guidance to Granting officers. However, we believed the May 15, 2025, preliminary injunction issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts in the case of Association of American Universities et al. v. U.S. Department of Energy would slow down DOE‘s implementation of the cap on indirect cost recovery for more than just Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs). Sadly, that is not the case.

You’ve won the contract; the work is underway (or even finished), but how do you actually get paid? Billing the federal government is an entirely separate process, often more complex than the work itself (if you let it be). Between compliance requirements, strict documentation rules, and lengthy payment terms, it’s no surprise that payment delays are one of the most common (and costly) frustrations in this space.

Here are the biggest billing challenges we see and how to stay ahead of them, so your cash flow doesn’t take a hit.