NIH Issues New Policy That Ends Foreign Subawards for Pending Grant Proposals

On May 1, 2025, the National Institute of Health (NIH) issued NOT-OD-25-104 updating its policy to reiterate the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) subaward reporting requirements. This policy change will also prohibit foreign subawards in grants and cooperative agreements effective May 1, 2025, until NIH has developed a new foreign collaboration award structure policy. NIH is hoping to issue its new policy by September 30, 2025.

Read More

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Government Regulations, Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200)

DOE Expands Indirect Cost Limits to State and Local Governments, Non-Profits, and For-Profit Organizations

On May 8, 2025, Department of Energy (DOE) issued three new policy flashes limiting the indirect costs on DOE grants to state and local government, for non-profit organizations and for-profit companies. DOE previously limited indirect costs for colleges and universities (i.e., Institutes of Higher Education) in its April 11, 2025 policy action.

Read More

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Proposal Cost Volume Development & Pricing, Government Regulations, Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200)

GAO Reports Significant Noncompliance Issues with Recipient’s Oversight of Subawards

The Government Accounting Office (GAO) issued a Report, Recent Guidance Could Enhance Subaward Oversight to the Senate dated March 26, 2025 (GAO-25-107315), on its review of subaward oversight based on requirements in 2 CFR 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Grants. While prime recipients have responsibility over subawards, federal agencies are required to ensure recipients carry out oversight responsibilities.

Read More

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Government Regulations, Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200)

Changes Ahead for University Grants as DOE Limits Indirect Costs to a 15% Rate Cap

On April 11, 2025, the Department of Energy (DOE) announced a new policy action to limit indirect costs of DOE research funding to Institutes of Higher Education (IHE) to 15%. DOE projects this change to generate over $405 million in annual savings. As expected, a judge has issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) on this policy. This comes on the heels of the National Institute of Health (NIH) issuing Supplemental Guidance to the 2023 NIH Grants Policy Statement: Indirect Costs dated February 7, 2025, limiting indirect costs on current and future grants to 15%. A Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) is still outstanding on the NIH policy.

Read More

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Government Regulations, Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200)

What to Know About FAR-Based Contracts and Grants

If you only have FAR-based contracts, you only have one set of regulations to follow – Federal Acquisition Regulations. But what happens if you have both FAR-based contracts and grants? Grants are covered under a whole different set of requirements in 2 CFR 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Let’s walk through some of the differences.

Read More

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200)

What Should I Do if My Contract or Grant is Affected by Executive Orders?

Executive Order Impacting Funding on Contract or Grant Work

The President issued an Executive Order (EO) on January 20, 2025, to immediately pause the disbursement of funds appropriated through the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (Public Law 117-169) or the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Public Law 117058). This relates to programs for issuing grants, loans, contracts, or any other financial disbursements of such appropriated funds. The Office of Management and Budget issued a guidance memo on January 28 and rescinded the memorandum on January 29.

Read More

Topics: Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200), REAs, Claims & Terminations

Purchasing and Procurement Requirements of FAR vs. 2 CFR 200

Both the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) used by Federal Agencies to acquire products and services to support their operations and 2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200 used by Federal Agencies for grants to support Federal programs set forth requirements that the organizations awarded contracts or grants have an established purchasing/procurement systems. Before getting a procurement under a grant, you must determine if any lower-tier organization is either a subrecipient or a contractor (read more in this article, “Understanding your Lower-Tier Relationships with Subrecipient and Contractor Determinations under 2 CFR 200.” In this article, we are only dealing with contractors under 2 CFR 200 and subcontractors under the FAR.

Read More

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR), Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200)

Understanding Indirect Costs Under FAR and 2 CFR 200

Direct Costs

To understand indirect costs, it is always best to understand direct costs. Below is a comparison of the definition of direct cost in the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) and 2 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 200. FAR Part 31 provides the cost principles for commercial for-profit organizations and 2 CFR 200 Subpart E provides the cost principles for all other organizations (e.g., non-profits and educational institutions).

Read More

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200)

What are the Benefits of 2 CFR 200.405(d) Direct Allocations?

Title 2 Subtitle A Chapter II of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) includes Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (i.e., grants and cooperative agreements). 2 CFR 200.405, Allocable costs, falls under Subpart E–Cost Principles applicable to all organizations that are not commercial for-profit organizations. 2 CFR 200.405(d) states:

Read More

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200)

Key Grant Regulations You Need to Know to Stay Compliant and Avoid Penalties

Grants are complex and the regulations in 2 CFR 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards aren’t exactly straight forward and easy to understand. When you receive a grant, you are expected to have internal controls in place such as policies and procedures, segregation of duties, timekeeping, documentation requirements, etc. If you do not have internal controls, you will need to implement them as soon as possible after award. While anyone can make mistakes, you don’t want continuous errors, overbillings, billing of unallowable costs to become significant noncompliance issues requiring corrective action or even the appearance of alleged fraud.

Read More

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200)