DCAA recently released Version 1.04 of the ICE Model that utilizes Microsoft Power Query to prepare incurred cost proposals. For government contractors preparing annual incurred cost submissions with Microsoft Power Query, this update should be used in replacement of the previous version released. Both the April 2026 Power Query version and the May 2019 Visual Basic version remain available, but each version carries different considerations for preparation, review, and submission through the Contractor Submission Portal.

The updated Power Query version is intended to improve compatibility with contract information such as contract ceiling issues on Schedule I. The instructions have been revised to provide better clarification of information required to properly run the power query version. The original Visual Basic version remains available, but contractors using this version need to be aware of a specific restriction in the Contractor Submission Portal. Files prepared in the Visual Basic version must be saved as .xls or .xlsx before uploading to the Contractor Submission Portal. The Contractor Submission Portal will not accept .xlsm macro files.

Topics: Accounting System Compliance, Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE), DCAA Audit Support, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

Contractors pursuing competitive prime awards under FAR Part 15 face heightened expectations for cost realism, documentation, and historical support. Agencies rely on detailed cost narratives and supporting data to make best value determinations. Weak or unsupported pricing can delay negotiations or undermine award decisions, making early preparation and internal alignment critical to proposal success.

Topics: Accounting System Compliance, Proposal Cost Volume Development & Pricing, Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE), Small Business Compliance, Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

For the last few years, our friends at the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) have been very helpful by publishing the Contractor Compensation Cap in the December timeframe. This year, I am guessing that the Government shutdown has diverted their attention. To help our clients, we have calculated the 2026 amount of the cap.

Topics: Accounting System Compliance, Proposal Cost Volume Development & Pricing, Employee & Contractor Compensation, Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE), DCAA Audit Support, Human Resources, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

On November 24, 2025, President Trump signed EO 14363, Launching the Genesis Mission to accelerate America’s race for global dominance in the application of AI to scientific discovery and scientific challenges.

Topics: Accounting System Compliance, Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE), DFARS Business Systems, DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200)

Well, our friendly DCAA auditors are back after the Government shutdown. On December 2, 2025, Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) issued a memorandum to their auditors titled, “Actions Required for Assignment Due Dates Following Furloughs.”

Topics: Proposal Cost Volume Development & Pricing, Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE), Small Business Compliance, Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations

We knew this was coming based on the June 30, 2025, PF 2025-38 (FAL 2025-05) Implementation of Indirect and Fringe Benefits Cost Reimbursement Limits on Financial Assistance Awards guidance to Granting officers. However, we believed the May 15, 2025, preliminary injunction issued by the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts in the case of Association of American Universities et al. v. U.S. Department of Energy would slow down DOE‘s implementation of the cap on indirect cost recovery for more than just Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs). Sadly, that is not the case.

Topics: Accounting System Compliance, Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE), DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations, Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200)

Recently, we conducted research related to some incurred cost audit findings for a client and came across an Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) case that highlighted key information every contractor, especially small businesses, should know. The Technology Systems, Inc. ASBCA No. 59577 reads like a soap opera. It starts with some ups and downs. There were audit findings in Fiscal Year (FY) 2001, which the contractor and the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) negotiated. For FY 2002 to 2006, the contractor’s indirect rates were accepted as proposed. This was followed by relationship issues during the FY 2007 audit between the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) auditor and the contractor (No surprise to most of us). Then, a period of separation occurred, from FY 2009 to 2013, when DCAA decided that proposal pricing supporting new contract awards was the priority. During this time, the contractor’s FY 2007 incurred cost audit was shelved, along with significant potential questioned costs. Then, in an act of desperation, the ACO issued a Contracting Officer’s Final Decision (COFD) based on a DCAA memorandum for the FY 2007, which questioned costs to avoid the statute of limitations running out. Ok, enough of the soap opera, let’s go through the things you need to know.

Topics: Accounting System Compliance, Proposal Cost Volume Development & Pricing, Litigation Consulting Support, Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE), DFARS Business Systems, DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

Contractors are required to use provisional billing rates when invoicing costs under cost reimbursable contracts or submitting an SF1443 Contractor’s Request for Progress Payment. FAR 42.704, Billing rates, requires the contracting officer or auditor (usually DCAA) to establish the billing rates. DCAA has undergone a reorganization, and the office assigned to your contractor site may have shut down or the staff may have been relocated.

Topics: Accounting System Compliance, Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE), DFARS Business Systems, DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

The Good

Ok, finding some good is going to be a challenge. Let's start with the fact that the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) receives approximately 3,500 incurred cost proposals annually, but only audits around 500 of them. And even though DCAA is still auditing about 75% of the dollars submitted ($193B), only .3% is questioned ($760M), and only 31% of that is likely to be sustained by contracting officers. This comes from the DCAA Report to Congress for 2024.

See, we did find some good.

Topics: Accounting System Compliance, Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE), DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

I believe most prudent businesspeople would consider providing water and coffee to their employees and customers a reasonable business expense and consider it an allowable cost. Well, Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) auditors are not most people and, in most cases, have little to no business experience, so they believe providing water and coffee is an unallowable cost.

Topics: Accounting System Compliance, Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE), DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)