Redstone Government Consulting Blog | Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) (2)

The now infamous NIH Guidance (NOT-OD-25-068) and Executive Order 14222 started us thinking. Is the Department of Defense (DoD) possibly the next domino to fall? After all, the DoD has a very large contract spend of $431.4 billion based on the Defense Spending by State, FY 2023 — Executive Summary. We looked to see if we could find data on how much of that spend is going to indirect costs (i.e., overhead). Surprisingly, the only data we could find is very dated. The data comes from the DoD Indirect-Cost Management Guide from October 2001 posted on the Defense Acquisition University (DAU) website. The guide states, “estimates made by the Defense Contract Management Command (DCMA), in conjunction with discussions with defense contractor top management on their DCMA Overhead Initiative, indicate[s] that indirect costs constitute approximately $90 billion of the $170 billion total DoD work in process at all defense contractor[s].” While not clear, our assumption is that this represents the 2000 or 2001 timeframe. Based on this, DoD is spending 53% of its appropriated funding on indirect costs. This means the average defense contractor has an approximate 100% indirect cost rate, covering overhead and general & administrative (G&A) costs. Based on recent experiences with our clients, we believe this is still a reasonable estimate of indirect cost on DoD contracts, if not a little higher.

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Proposal Cost Volume Development & Pricing, DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations, Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

If you only have FAR-based contracts, you only have one set of regulations to follow – Federal Acquisition Regulations. But what happens if you have both FAR-based contracts and grants? Grants are covered under a whole different set of requirements in 2 CFR 200 Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. Let’s walk through some of the differences.

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200)

What is a Department of Defense (DoD) class deviation? It is a deviation from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) or Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation (DFARS) that affects more than one contract. They are issued by an authorized official and are used to deviate from the FAR or DFARS and offer flexibility in the acquisition process. Class deviations are supposed to be temporary. If the class deviation will become permanent, the Government is supposed to issue a proposed revision to the FAR or DFARS.

Topics: Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, System Award Management (SAM), Government Regulations, Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Cybersecurity

The Federal Funding and Accountability Transparency Act (FFATA) requires prime contractors to report their first-tier subcontracts and grant recipients to report their first-tier subawards using the Federal Funding and Accountability Transparency Act Subaward Reporting System website.

Topics: Employee & Contractor Compensation, Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, DFARS Business Systems, Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR), System Award Management (SAM), Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

Executive Order Impacting Funding on Contract or Grant Work

The President issued an Executive Order (EO) on January 20, 2025, to immediately pause the disbursement of funds appropriated through the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (Public Law 117-169) or the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Public Law 117058). This relates to programs for issuing grants, loans, contracts, or any other financial disbursements of such appropriated funds. The Office of Management and Budget issued a guidance memo on January 28 and rescinded the memorandum on January 29.

Topics: Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200), REAs, Claims & Terminations

FAR 1.604 allows a contracting officer (CO) to designate a representative to assist the CO in the technical monitoring and administration of a contract. The CO authorizes the contracting officer’s representative (COR) to perform many important tasks to assist the CO in administrating the contract during performance. However, FAR 1.602-2(d)(5) specifically prohibits the CO from authorizing the COR “to make any commitments or changes that affect price, quality, quantity, delivery, or other terms and conditions of the contract nor in any way direct the contractor or its subcontractors to operate in conflict with the contract terms and conditions.”

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), REAs, Claims & Terminations

Does the Government find most of the cost incurred by a contractor to be reasonable? I must say it does appear that way. Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) FY 2023 Report to Congress shows that of the $186B incurred cost audited, there was only $1.1B in audit exceptions (.6%). So, the world is good, and we can move on. If that were only the case. Remember that while this percentage is low, this is money you have already spent that the Government will not pay you for, which directly impacts your bottom line.

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE), Small Business Compliance, DFARS Business Systems, DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

Why do contractors have to do market research? Simply put, you signed a contract with the US Government or a subcontract with a prime contractor that expects it – yes, it is contractually required. Plus, it is one of the most often reported contractor purchasing system review (CPSR) findings.

Topics: Proposal Cost Volume Development & Pricing, Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR), Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Commercial Item Determination

The FAR Council issued a proposed rule on January 15, 2025, to expand the CUI requirements into FAR under Executive Order 13556 Controlled Unclassified Information. Controlled Unclassified Information is information that the government creates or possesses, or that an entity creates or possesses for or on behalf of the government, that a law, regulation, or governmentwide policy requires or permits an agency to handle using safeguarding or dissemination controls. CUI may not be released to the public.

Topics: Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, DFARS Business Systems, Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR), Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Cybersecurity

We have had several clients tell us they have purchase orders under the Truthful Cost or Pricing Data (TINA) threshold for what they believe to be commercial purchases. They run a quick search on the purchase order (PO) and find there are no Federal Acquisition (FAR) or Defense FAR Supplement (DFARS) clauses in the agreement even though the prime contract is to the U.S. Government.

Topics: Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, DFARS Business Systems, Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)