Redstone Government Consulting Blog | Government Regulations (2)

Terminated contracts do not relieve a contractor from dispositioning and closing out Government property. This will become a bigger issue as more and more agencies receive funding cuts or contracts are simply terminated.

Topics: Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, DFARS Business Systems, DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations, Government Property Management, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

On April 9, 2025, President Trump signed the Executive Order (EO), Modernizing Defense Acquisitions and Spurring Innovation in the Defense Industrial Base. The EO indicated that the factory floor is as significant as the battlefield, and the current defense acquisition system must have a comprehensive overhaul to deliver state-of-the-art capabilities at speed and scale.

Topics: Proposal Cost Volume Development & Pricing, Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR), Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Commercial Item Determination

On April 7, 2025, Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Director Ms. Jennifer Desautel announced a major DCAA reorganization to her staff that is perhaps DCAA’s largest since its 1965 inception. With the current federal government’s stress on efficiency and cost reduction, DCAA faced increased pressure to contain its costs and become more efficient. As a result, Ms. Desautel immediately began reorganizing the field and headquarters offices. DCAA will now have three Directorates (shown below): Land, Sea, and Air.

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Small Business Compliance, Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations

The Department of Justice (DOJ) implemented an initiative to pursue cybersecurity fraud in 2021 (see our article on DOJ Initiative on Cyber Security Incident Reporting), and it is apparently working.

Topics: Litigation Consulting Support, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Cybersecurity

There is no definition of split purchases in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) or Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS). However, the Defense Contract Management Agency reviews purchase order files for split purchases during a Contractor Purchasing System Review. The Government considers a split purchase when a contractor intentionally breaks down a requirement to stay under a regulatory threshold (e.g., micro-purchase, simplified acquisition threshold, or Truthful Cost or Pricing Data Act (TINA)) in order to circumvent procurement requirements or avoid having to compete.

Topics: Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, DFARS Business Systems, DCAA Audit Support, Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR), Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity, has left many unsure as to what you can, cannot, should, or should not do. You are not alone! There are many unanswered questions, so we do not and could not claim to have all the answers, but we do have some thoughts and suggestions to consider at this stage.

Topics: Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, Human Resources, Government Regulations, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

It may be an understatement to say defense contractors are currently living in changing times. Change has happened in our government administration resulting in some changes in priorities in federal government programs. This can translate into federal government contracts being changed, suspended, stopped, or even terminated. Although contract terminations seem complex, you can navigate through the complexities by reading and understanding your contract clauses, the acquisition rules, working with your contracting officer, and knowing your cost reporting system and how it can comply with contracting regulations.

Topics: Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), REAs, Claims & Terminations

On April 24, 2024, the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania issued a decision on the Defendant’s request to dismiss a False Claims Act brought by a relator alleging violations and retaliation by Magee-Womens Research Institute and Foundation (Foundation), University of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital under the False Claims Act. The decision identified the areas of the False Claims Act that pertained to the case as follows:

• Knowingly present, or cause to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval
• Knowingly make, use, or cause to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim
• Conspire to commit a violation
• Knowingly make, use, or cause to be made or used, a false record or statement material to an obligation to pay or transmit money or property to the Government, or knowingly conceal or decrease an obligation to pay or transmit money.

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Litigation Consulting Support, Government Regulations

How much do you know about DCAA and its oversight of your incurred cost proposals (ICP) and indirect cost rates? Would it help to understand what is done and why? Knowing what initiates a DCAA audit of an incurred cost proposal and maintaining a good system of internal controls can potentially keep you from audit.

Topics: Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE), DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations, Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

The now infamous NIH Guidance (NOT-OD-25-068) and Executive Order 14222 started us thinking. Is the Department of Defense (DoD) possibly the next domino to fall? After all, the DoD has a very large contract spend of $431.4 billion based on the Defense Spending by State, FY 2023 — Executive Summary. We looked to see if we could find data on how much of that spend is going to indirect costs (i.e., overhead). Surprisingly, the only data we could find is very dated. The data comes from the DoD Indirect-Cost Management Guide from October 2001 posted on the Defense Acquisition University (DAU) website. The guide states, “estimates made by the Defense Contract Management Command (DCMA), in conjunction with discussions with defense contractor top management on their DCMA Overhead Initiative, indicate[s] that indirect costs constitute approximately $90 billion of the $170 billion total DoD work in process at all defense contractor[s].” While not clear, our assumption is that this represents the 2000 or 2001 timeframe. Based on this, DoD is spending 53% of its appropriated funding on indirect costs. This means the average defense contractor has an approximate 100% indirect cost rate, covering overhead and general & administrative (G&A) costs. Based on recent experiences with our clients, we believe this is still a reasonable estimate of indirect cost on DoD contracts, if not a little higher.

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Proposal Cost Volume Development & Pricing, DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations, Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)