All one has to do is read a recent article written by David Cox, President of the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), to derive the answer to this question, and the answer is that contractor employee compensation should be brought in line with the salaries that public sector employees (e.g., federal civilian personnel) are paid.
Darryl Walker
Recent Posts
Topics: Proposal Cost Volume Development & Pricing, Employee & Contractor Compensation
The Department of Defense (DOD) June 28, 2013 “Performance of the Defense Acquisition System” annual report states that little difference exists between fixed price and cost-plus contracts when it comes to predicting or controlling costs.
Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, Government Compliance Training
President Obama will purportedly send to Congress proposed legislation this week which will cap reimbursement of all government contractor employee annual salaries at $400,000, the President’s annual (base) salary. The proposed legislation is an expansion of the FY 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) approved in early CY 2013, applicable only to Department of Defense Contracts, which would ostensibly apply to all government contracts awarded by civilian government agencies, and elevate the cap from the previously debated ceiling of $230,700 (Vice-President’s salary) to the $400,000 amount.
Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Small Business Compliance, Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, Government Compliance Training
Has the Government Learned Its Lesson? Your Feedback is requested.
Perhaps the most subjective cost allowability determination process utilized by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) is that associated with determining reasonableness of Government contractor employee compensation, more specifically the wages and benefits of senior managers and executives. Government contractors more likely to endure examination and challenging of such compensation are those with cost reimbursable contracts which invoke the audit of annual incurred cost proposals (ICP) via contract payment clauses. The audit review is a highly subjective process with the purpose of determining if annual compensation exceeds a hypothetical “reasonableness” benchmark, using ambiguous criteria contained in FAR 31.205-6(b)(2), i.e., measured to wage surveys reflecting compensation for same job position within companies of same size, same industry, same geographic area, and engaged in same type of non-government work as performed under government contracts.
Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE), Small Business Compliance, Government Compliance Training, DFARS Business Systems, DCAA Audit Support
Contractor Agrees to Reimburse Employees for Back Wages after Cited SCA Violation
An investigation conducted by the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Wage and Hour Division for compliance with the McNamara-O’Hara Service Contract Act (SCA) and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (CWHSSA) revealed that CH, Inc. violated the provisions of these two statutes by underpaying 35 employees $268,899 in fringe benefits and overtime which, under the statutes, those employees were entitled to receive.
Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Litigation Consulting Support, Small Business Compliance, Contracts & Subcontracts Administration
The Department of Defense Inspector General(DOD IG) issued a March 7, 2013 report charging that the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) failed to “exercise sufficient professional judgment” while performing certain audits between 2006 and 2010 signaling another bump in the long road ahead for the Agency's return to compliance with GAGAS.
Topics: Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, DOD IG, DCAA Audit Support