--- title: Provisional Billing Rates ARE NOT Pricing Bid Rates description: Provisional billing rates are established by either the ACO (Administrative Contracting Officer) or DCAA (Defense Contract Audit Agency). image: https://info.redstonegci.com/hubfs/images/Blog_Images_with_title/Redstone_-_Provisional_Billing_Rates_ARE_NOT_Pricing_Bid_Rates_-_Social.png --- [ PAY INVOICE](https://redstonegci.com/invoice-payment/) [Call Us Today 256-704-9800](tel:2567049800) [info@redstonegci.com](Mailto:info@redstonegci.com) [![Redstone_Logo](https://info.redstonegci.com/hubfs/redstone%20logo%20version%201%20-%20rgb-1.png)](https://www.redstonegci.com/) # Provisional Billing Rates ARE NOT Pricing Bid Rates [Posted by Michael Steen on Thu, Aug 11, 2016 @ 16:08 PM](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/author/michael-steen) - [Tweet](https://twitter.com/share) ![Redstone_-_Provisional_Billing_Rates_ARE_NOT_Pricing_Bid_Rates_-_Social](https://info.redstonegci.com/hs-fs/hubfs/images/Blog_Images_with_title/Redstone_-_Provisional_Billing_Rates_ARE_NOT_Pricing_Bid_Rates_-_Social.png?width=1000&name=Redstone_-_Provisional_Billing_Rates_ARE_NOT_Pricing_Bid_Rates_-_Social.png) Provisional billing rates are established by either the ACO (Administrative Contracting Officer) or DCAA (Defense Contract Audit Agency).   As described in a 2014 DCAA Audit Policy (MRD 14-PPS-012, dated July 22, 2014), per FAR 42.704, provisional billing rates should be established early within a contractor fiscal year for purposes of invoicing indirect costs (on cost-type contracts or any contract which ultimately requires final indirect cost rates per FAR 42.705).   For anyone familiar with FAR, it is self-evident that provisional billing rates are based upon FAR Part 42, which details [contract administration versus proposal contract pricing](https://www.redstonegci.com/consulting/government-compliance/dcaa-audit-support/), (typically FAR Part 15, if cost or pricing data is required).   Although there may be similarities, the proposal process involves solicitation clauses, whereas a contract award contains contractual clauses. Why mention FAR Part 15 juxtaposed with FAR Part 42?   To highlight the fact that bid rates (forward pricing rates) are intertwined with FAR Part 15, numerically and chronologically preceding provisional billing rates linked to FAR Part 42. Of utmost importance, to emphasize that simplistically using provisional billing rates as forward pricing bid rates is becoming a recipe for disaster (under the informal laws of unintended consequences). Recent (client) experience, proposing provisional billing rates, and specifically describing them as such, resulted in bid losses because the source selection official could not determine a probable cost for the contractor.   By definition, provisional billing rates apply to a current fiscal year with no assumption that these current year rates are a reasonable projection of indirect rates for subsequent years.   Unless a solicitation and its contemplated period of performance is extremely narrow (within a current fiscal year), the provisional billing rates simply do not address rates for subsequent years.   From the perspective of the government source selection official or his/her team, the government is theoretically left without any contractor (bidder) support for out-year indirect costs. The government cannot assume that the bidder’s current fiscal year provisional billing rates are a reasonable projection of that bidders’ forecasts, budgets, and forward pricing rates. In addition, the use of provisional billing rates leaves unanswered the question of bid rates based upon an assumption that the bidder will be awarded the contract. In some cases, solicitations expressly state that requirement, *i.e.* the bidder must be able to demonstrate that its bid rates include an assumed win (for example, that the indirect allocation bases factor in the base generated by the contract).   Although the government has the option to adjust a bidder’s cost estimate, the government is not required to correct a bid by supplying forward pricing bid rates in place of provisional billing rates. Not that it changes the requirement for potential contractors (bidders), but government price or cost analysts have also fallen into the trap of using provisional billing rates as the sole basis for a cost realism analysis. In one recent case, the government cost analyst used 2013 provisional billing rates, (the only “government approved” rates he/she had, and significantly increased the bidder’s cost estimate. The bidder was then considered outside the cost competitive range; however, the bidder successfully protested and the evaluation/source selection was re-opened. Provisional billing rates “might” be reasonable for forward pricing, but a responsive bidder must consider the future, not only the past and present.   Hence, some contractors attempt to develop a forecast that is presented as “projected rates” and absolutely not described as provisional billing rates.   If there is one specific point of reference, it is the DCAA provisional rate letter establishing provisional billing rates. This letter includes the following restriction: “The established rate shall not be used for any other purpose than for provisional billing rates (e.g. forward pricing or final indirect cost rates”. Although DCAA cannot dictate contractor forward pricing rates that “might be” essentially the same as the [DCAA established provisional billing rates](https://www.redstonegci.com/consulting/government-compliance/dcaa-audit-support/), the DCAA restriction is all-too often accepted at face value by a source selection official in evaluating a contractor proposal. Thus, if I simply use them, and even worse, represent them as DCAA approved rates, I am ignoring the DCAA restriction. Unlike provisional billing rates (FAR 42.704), contractor forward pricing rates are embedded within the FAR 15.408, Table I5-2, II C. Indirect Costs: “Indicate how you have computed and applied your indirect costs, including cost breakdowns. **Show trends and budgetary data to provide a basis for evaluating the reasonableness of proposed rates ***(emphasis added).*” In the case of contractors with a high volume of pricing, FAR 15.407-3 Forward Pricing Rate Agreements (FPRA) may apply, implicating a detailed Forward Pricing Rate Proposal (FPRP) and possibly a FPRA.   In any case to support a bid, the potential contractor should categorize its rates as Forward Pricing Rates (FPR). Historical rates and/or provisional billing rates may then be included to support the reasonableness of the FPRs. Never simply propose provisional billing rates to support a cost estimate. Preparing Forward Pricing Rates may seem as daunting as attempting to predict the future; however, it is about maintaining structural comparability to historical rates, yet considering the future and developing and documenting assumptions about the future. [![Learn More About Our DCAA Approved Accounting System Compliance Services](https://no-cache.hubspot.com/cta/default/203971/interactive-168859204684.png) ](https://info.redstonegci.com/hs/cta/wi/redirect?encryptedPayload=AVxigLJtOaTHx%2FVNRdDGb1VvmYwqOqO6D9xW053V3t0FmsTSYokOpt2x84gs1DWrhjUQe28KzF7%2B%2FwHGdE1VYhCdFvq5YsVep%2Br7SYfP5yAppc3h6dlGljNF5QBvbkmxGfaBaZeZ7IhYmjKMP4f0ZCiyvq74ay7STO9gh12jTVjxIBpYgV1TC%2BnWvaWNgcuWTxC2NCl4ABQloXtSHuTkvB%2FBLVQXu8DntPbxRA8H5Ip170tzEAosXJKLdgq8&webInteractiveContentId=168859204684&portalId=203971) ### Written by [Michael Steen](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/author/michael-steen) ![Michael Steen](https://info.redstonegci.com/hubfs/images/Staff_/Michael-Steen-Redstone-Government-Consulting.png) Mike Steen is a Emeritus Advisor with Redstone Government Consulting, Inc. and a specialist in complex compliance issues to include major contractor cost accounting & business system regulations, financial compliance, resolution of DCAA audit issues, Cost Accounting Standards application, litigation support, and claims preparation. Prior to joining Redstone Government Consulting, Mike served in a number of capacities with DCAA for over thirty years, and upon his retirement, he was one of the top seven senior executives with DCAA. Mike Served as a Regional Director for two DCAA regions, and during that time was responsible for audits of approximately $25B and 800 employees. In October 2001, he was selected for the Senior Executive Service and in 2006 he received the Presidential Rank Award. During Mike’s tenure with DCAA, he was involved in conducting or managing a variety of compliance audits, to include cost proposals, billing systems, Cost Accounting Standards, claims, defective pricing, and then-evolving programs such as restructuring, financial capability and agreed-upon procedures. He directly supported the government litigation team on significant contract disputes and has prepared and presented various lectures and seminars to DCAA staff and business community leaders. Since joining Redstone Government Consulting in June 2007, Mike has developed and presented training and seminars on Government Contracts Compliance to NCMA, Federal Publications Seminars and various clients. Mike also is a prolific contributor of written articles to government contracting publications, as well as to our own Government Insights Newsletter. Mike also serves as the director of our training service offerings, with responsibilities for preparing and developing course content as well as instructing our seminars to clients and general audiences throughout the U.S. Mike also serves as a faculty instructor for the Federal Publications Seminars organization. Education Mike has a BS Degree in Business Administration from Wichita State University. He is also a graduate of the DCAA Director’s Fellowship Program in Management, and has a Masters Degree in Administration from Central Michigan University. Mr. Steen also completed a number of OPM’s management and executive development courses. ## About Redstone GCI Redstone GCI is a consulting firm focused on fulfilling the needs of government contractors in all areas of compliance. With a singular mission to help contractors through the multiple layers of “red tape,” we allow contractors to focus on what they do best – support their mission with the U.S. Government. We are home to a group of consultants made up of GovCon industry professionals, CPAs, attorneys, and retired government audit and acquisition professionals. Our focus and knowledge of audit and compliance functions administered by DCAA and DCMA will always be at the heart of what we do. However, for the past decade, we’ve strategically grown to support other areas of the government contractor back-office with that same level of focus and expertise. We’ve added expertise in contracts management, subcontract administration, proposal pricing, various software systems, HR and employment law, property administration, manufacturing, data analytics/reporting, Grant specialists, M&A, and many other areas. When we see a trend in the needs of contractors, we act to ensure we can provide the best expertise in the market to fulfill those needs. One thing our clients can be certain of is that with the Redstone GCI Team in your corner, there is no problem too big and no issue too technical for our team to tackle. Topics: [Accounting System Compliance](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/accounting-system-compliance) ### Search Posts This is a search field with an auto-suggest feature attached. - There are no suggestions because the search field is empty. ### Subscribe via E-mail ### Latest Posts ### Posts by category - [Accounting System Compliance (282)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/accounting-system-compliance) - [Commercial Determination (34)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/commercial-determination) - [Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR) (85)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/contractor-purchasing-system-review-cpsr) - [Contracts & Subcontracts Administration (300)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/contracts-subcontracts-administration) - [Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) (60)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/cost-accounting-standards-cas) - [COVID-19 (23)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/covid-19) - [Customer Success Story (2)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/customer-success-story) - [Cybersecurity (28)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/cybersecurity) - [DCAA Audit Support (249)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/dcaa-audit-support) - [Defense Procurement & Acquisition Policy (DPAP) (7)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/defense-procurement-acquisition-policy-dpap) - [Deltek Costpoint (54)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/deltek-costpoint) - [DFARS Business Systems (179)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/dfars-business-systems) - [DOD IG (10)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/dod-ig) - [Employee & Contractor Compensation (22)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/employee-contractor-compensation) - [Employers & Unions (8)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/employers-unions) - [Estimating System Compliance (18)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/estimating-system-compliance) - [Export & Import (19)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/export-import) - [Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) (187)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/federal-acquisition-regulation-far) - [Federal Construction Contracting (4)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/federal-construction-contracting) - [Government Compliance Training (59)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/government-compliance-training) - [Government Property Management (18)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/government-property-management) - [Government Regulations (265)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/government-regulations) - [Government Shutdown (9)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/government-shutdown) - [Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200) (32)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/grants-cooperative-agreements-2-cfr-200) - [Human Resources (118)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/human-resources) - [Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE) (83)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/incurred-cost-proposal-submission-icp-ice) - [Litigation Consulting Support (17)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/litigation-consulting-support) - [Manufacturing Operations Consulting (26)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/manufacturing-operations-consulting) - [Material Management & Accounting System (MMAS) (23)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/material-management-accounting-system-mmas) - [Non-US Government Contractor (3)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/non-us-government-contractor) - [Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (31)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/office-of-federal-contract-compliance-programs) - [Organizational Change Management Consulting (17)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/organizational-change-management-consulting) - [Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Loans (8)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/paycheck-protection-program-ppp-loans) - [Program Management & Project Cost Control (2)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/program-management-project-cost-control) - [Proposal Cost Volume Development & Pricing (79)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/proposal-cost-volume-development-pricing) - [Quickbooks (21)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/quickbooks) - [REAs, Claims & Terminations (10)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/reas-claims-terminations) - [Redstone GCI (50)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/redstone-gci) - [Sequestration (4)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/sequestration) - [Service Contract Act (14)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/service-contract-act) - [Small Business Compliance (121)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/small-business-compliance) - [System Award Management (SAM) (9)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/system-award-management-sam) - [UKG Ready HR Software Consulting (7)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/ukg-ready-hr-software-consulting) - [Unanet (35)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/unanet) - [Vlog (41)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/vlog) ### Disclaimer ``` Data published on our website, such as our white papers, blogs and other government contracting commentary reflect our interpretations and opinions of current events and regulations, at the time such data is published, and the perspectives/opinions of other professionals in our industry may vary from our own.  Further, our commentary and perspectives do not reflect legal analyses, since we are not attorneys, but rather government contracts and accounting advisors.  We therefore make no representation that the use of our published information will insulate a company from government challenges, nor otherwise ensure a successful defense on any government procurement adverse action.  Readers agree that articles or blog commentary presented within our website shall not be replicated or re-published without requesting before publication in another medium, and our expressed written consent to do so. ``` **Redstone Government Consulting** 501 Madison Street SE, Suite 100 Huntsville, AL 35801 **Phone: ** [256.704.9800](tel:2567049800) **Email Us**[ info@redstonegci.com](mailto:info@redstonegci.com) **[PAY INVOICE](https://redstonegci.com/invoice-payment/)** [PCI DSS compliance documentation](https://redstonegci.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/pci_dss_self_assessment_certificate.pdf) © 2026 Redstone Government Consulting | All Rights Reserved | [Privacy Policy](https://redstonegci.com/privacy-policy/) | [Event Refund / Cancellation Policy](https://redstonegci.com/event-refund-cancellation-policy/)