---
title: DOE Withdraws Contractor Business Systems’ Rule
description: On July 6, 2016, the DOE quietly withdrew its April 1, 2014 proposed rule, “Contractor Business Systems—Definition and Administration. Learn more in our article
image: https://info.redstonegci.com/hubfs/images/Blog_Images_with_title/Redstone_-_DOE_Withdraws_Contractor_Business_Systems_Rule-Social.png
---

[ PAY INVOICE](https://redstonegci.com/invoice-payment/) [Call Us Today 256-704-9800](tel:2567049800) [info@redstonegci.com](Mailto:info@redstonegci.com)

<http://www.facebook.com/redstonegci> <http://www.twitter.com/RedstoneGCI> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/redstone-government-consulting-inc-> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQv3eAwiPTTQAnoy7hnUwgg>

[![Redstone_Logo](https://info.redstonegci.com/hubfs/redstone%20logo%20version%201%20-%20rgb-1.png)](https://www.redstonegci.com/)

# DOE Withdraws Contractor Business Systems’ Rule

[Posted by Michael Steen on Thu, Jul 14, 2016 @ 12:07 PM](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/author/michael-steen)

- [Tweet](https://twitter.com/share)

![Redstone_-_DOE_Withdraws_Contractor_Business_Systems_Rule-Social](https://info.redstonegci.com/hs-fs/hubfs/images/Blog_Images_with_title/Redstone_-_DOE_Withdraws_Contractor_Business_Systems_Rule-Social.png?width=1000&name=Redstone_-_DOE_Withdraws_Contractor_Business_Systems_Rule-Social.png)

On July 6, 2016, the DOE (Department of Energy) quietly withdrew its April 1, 2014 proposed rule, “Contractor Business Systems—Definition and Administration. The April 2014 proposed rule which defined five business systems was modeled after similar business systems requirements imposed upon DOD Contractors (DFARS 252.242-7005 along with six interrelated regulations pertaining to each of the six business systems noting that the five DOE systems excluded MMAS). Also in common with DOD, the statement or mantra, that “Contractor business systems and internal controls are the first line in defense against fraud, waste and abuse. That statement was excessively used by the Commission on Wartime Contracting, a Bi-Partisan Commission whose August 2011 248-page report concluded that at least $31 billion and possibly as much as $60 billion was wasted in Iraq & Afghanistan from 2002-2008 ($4.4B to $8.6B annually; by comparison, Government agencies estimate annual improper payments exceeding $100 billion in each year 2009-2015).   If one bothers to read the 248-page report, one would also surmise that most of the waste resulted from government failures which notably includes one singular failure, the lack of any accountability for $6.6B of a $9.1B cash shipment.

Back to the DOE proposed and subsequently withdrawn contractor business systems’ rule, in 2013 DOE issued Policy Flash 2013-71 internally introducing the contractor business systems clauses, which was supplemented by a PowerPoint training file which described the system criteria and the system administration, notably, a 5% payment withhold applied if a contractor had a deficient business system.

![blog-image-redstone.jpg](https://info.redstonegci.com/hs-fs/hubfs/images/Blog_Images_with_title/blog-image-redstone.jpg?width=192&name=blog-image-redstone.jpg)By any measure, the April 2014 proposed rule was an important (future) regulation designed to motivate [DOE contractors to maintain compliant business systems](https://info.redstonegci.com/dfars-business-systems), thereby establishing the front-line of defense against fraud, waste and abuse.  Fast-forward to July 6, 2016 when the once “flashy” requirement was quietly withdrawn with absolutely no stated reasons for inexplicably (by implication) leaving DOE without a front-line defense against contractor fraud, waste and abuse.

In the absence of a stated reason (or reasons) for this unexpected turn-of-events, we have performed exhaustive research in an attempt to identify the unstated reasons for DOE’s July 6, 2016 action. In the creative and somewhat whimsical opinion of Redstone Government Consulting, we’ve listed the top five (somewhat speculative) reasons which all have a common theme: (in reference to government acquisition):

1. The DOE Program Manager, who had been tracking this proposed rule, retired on June 30, 2016 and only after this person retired did DOE realize that he/she had been maintaining all of the files and emails on a personal server.
2. DOE has come to terms with the fact that most of its contracting problems are internal and implementing one more regulation to pass-the-buck (blame contractors) won’t have any impact on the billions wasted because of the changing political whims of Congress or the Administration (reference to the billions spent on nuclear waste sites, such as Yucca Mountain in Nevada, which was closed in 2011…per the GAO, the site was closed for political reasons and not for technical reasons).
3. Knowing that DOE did not have the resources to audit for contractor compliance, DOE had hoped to follow DOD in terms of requiring DOE contractors to self-certify and to obtain independent third party audits of contractor business systems compliance. That “hope” was i) linked to a DFARS 2014 proposal (DFARS Case 2012-D042) and ii) “dashed” when the DFARS proposal was withdrawn with the terse explanation: “case closed with no further action on 02/04/2015”.
4. DOE realized that the DFARS business systems rule was basically a ruse; in particular that DOD’s rule has imposed administrative requirements and costs without any measurable benefit (other than to perpetuate the myth that government contract fraud, waste and abuse can be eliminated by contractor internal controls as if such controls can overcome government failings).
5. DOE has an effective organizational “moral compass” which won’t allow it to impose requirements on government contractors while knowing that the government does not live up to similar expectations (reference to the $100+B annually in improper payments and, in spite of spending billions for consulting services/outside “help”, the government’s inability to achieve auditable financial statements, a legal requirement, since 1997).

[![Learn More About Our Business System Compliance Services](https://no-cache.hubspot.com/cta/default/203971/interactive-173904525915.png) ](https://info.redstonegci.com/hs/cta/wi/redirect?encryptedPayload=AVxigLKfYa5ea3igJ8kXeHMnlEVQZZhXSEBVLF9Rl5S5v4GWnZXacp3cKd2LGnYeYq%2Bj5t%2BXcvYyW%2BwJk2xpKyb59gKWOuxv51DXnfyN%2FzgbLpJOzSbqlMrtyUhkApelWxFwGy%2F1rVo4YZ3xHqDfw%2F%2BW5EfQBlIwtNvz%2BOHQrpIUKsXp%2FKiNJ83F4QQx1i3IdtttH7o1vatQJSLolfxWInI%3D&webInteractiveContentId=173904525915&portalId=203971)

### Written by [Michael Steen](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/author/michael-steen)

![Michael Steen](https://info.redstonegci.com/hubfs/images/Staff_/Michael-Steen-Redstone-Government-Consulting.png) Mike Steen is a Emeritus Advisor with Redstone Government Consulting, Inc. and a specialist in complex compliance issues to include major contractor cost accounting & business system regulations, financial compliance, resolution of DCAA audit issues, Cost Accounting Standards application, litigation support, and claims preparation. Prior to joining Redstone Government Consulting, Mike served in a number of capacities with DCAA for over thirty years, and upon his retirement, he was one of the top seven senior executives with DCAA. Mike Served as a Regional Director for two DCAA regions, and during that time was responsible for audits of approximately $25B and 800 employees. In October 2001, he was selected for the Senior Executive Service and in 2006 he received the Presidential Rank Award. During Mike’s tenure with DCAA, he was involved in conducting or managing a variety of compliance audits, to include cost proposals, billing systems, Cost Accounting Standards, claims, defective pricing, and then-evolving programs such as restructuring, financial capability and agreed-upon procedures. He directly supported the government litigation team on significant contract disputes and has prepared and presented various lectures and seminars to DCAA staff and business community leaders. Since joining Redstone Government Consulting in June 2007, Mike has developed and presented training and seminars on Government Contracts Compliance to NCMA, Federal Publications Seminars and various clients. Mike also is a prolific contributor of written articles to government contracting publications, as well as to our own Government Insights Newsletter. Mike also serves as the director of our training service offerings, with responsibilities for preparing and developing course content as well as instructing our seminars to clients and general audiences throughout the U.S. Mike also serves as a faculty instructor for the Federal Publications Seminars organization. Education Mike has a BS Degree in Business Administration from Wichita State University. He is also a graduate of the DCAA Director’s Fellowship Program in Management, and has a Masters Degree in Administration from Central Michigan University. Mr. Steen also completed a number of OPM’s management and executive development courses.

## About Redstone GCI

Redstone GCI is a consulting firm focused on fulfilling the needs of government contractors in all areas of compliance. With a singular mission to help contractors through the multiple layers of “red tape,” we allow contractors to focus on what they do best – support their mission with the U.S. Government. We are home to a group of consultants made up of GovCon industry professionals, CPAs, attorneys, and retired government audit and acquisition professionals.

Our focus and knowledge of audit and compliance functions administered by DCAA and DCMA will always be at the heart of what we do. However, for the past decade, we’ve strategically grown to support other areas of the government contractor back-office with that same level of focus and expertise. We’ve added expertise in contracts management, subcontract administration, proposal pricing, various software systems, HR and employment law, property administration, manufacturing, data analytics/reporting, Grant specialists, M&A, and many other areas. When we see a trend in the needs of contractors, we act to ensure we can provide the best expertise in the market to fulfill those needs.

One thing our clients can be certain of is that with the Redstone GCI Team in your corner, there is no problem too big and no issue too technical for our team to tackle.

 Topics: [DFARS Business Systems](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/dfars-business-systems)

### Search Posts

This is a search field with an auto-suggest feature attached.

- There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.

### Subscribe via E-mail

### Latest Posts

### Posts by category

- [Accounting System Compliance (282)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/accounting-system-compliance)
- [Commercial Determination (34)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/commercial-determination)
- [Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR) (85)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/contractor-purchasing-system-review-cpsr)
- [Contracts & Subcontracts Administration (300)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/contracts-subcontracts-administration)
- [Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) (60)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/cost-accounting-standards-cas)
- [COVID-19 (23)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/covid-19)
- [Customer Success Story (2)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/customer-success-story)
- [Cybersecurity (28)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/cybersecurity)
- [DCAA Audit Support (249)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/dcaa-audit-support)
- [Defense Procurement & Acquisition Policy (DPAP) (7)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/defense-procurement-acquisition-policy-dpap)
- [Deltek Costpoint (54)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/deltek-costpoint)
- [DFARS Business Systems (179)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/dfars-business-systems)
- [DOD IG (10)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/dod-ig)
- [Employee & Contractor Compensation (22)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/employee-contractor-compensation)
- [Employers & Unions (8)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/employers-unions)
- [Estimating System Compliance (18)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/estimating-system-compliance)
- [Export & Import (19)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/export-import)
- [Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) (187)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/federal-acquisition-regulation-far)
- [Federal Construction Contracting (4)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/federal-construction-contracting)
- [Government Compliance Training (59)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/government-compliance-training)
- [Government Property Management (18)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/government-property-management)
- [Government Regulations (265)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/government-regulations)
- [Government Shutdown (9)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/government-shutdown)
- [Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200) (32)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/grants-cooperative-agreements-2-cfr-200)
- [Human Resources (118)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/human-resources)
- [Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE) (83)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/incurred-cost-proposal-submission-icp-ice)
- [Litigation Consulting Support (17)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/litigation-consulting-support)
- [Manufacturing Operations Consulting (26)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/manufacturing-operations-consulting)
- [Material Management & Accounting System (MMAS) (23)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/material-management-accounting-system-mmas)
- [Non-US Government Contractor (3)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/non-us-government-contractor)
- [Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (31)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/office-of-federal-contract-compliance-programs)
- [Organizational Change Management Consulting (17)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/organizational-change-management-consulting)
- [Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Loans (8)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/paycheck-protection-program-ppp-loans)
- [Program Management & Project Cost Control (2)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/program-management-project-cost-control)
- [Proposal Cost Volume Development & Pricing (79)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/proposal-cost-volume-development-pricing)
- [Quickbooks (21)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/quickbooks)
- [REAs, Claims & Terminations (10)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/reas-claims-terminations)
- [Redstone GCI (50)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/redstone-gci)
- [Sequestration (4)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/sequestration)
- [Service Contract Act (14)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/service-contract-act)
- [Small Business Compliance (121)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/small-business-compliance)
- [System Award Management (SAM) (9)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/system-award-management-sam)
- [UKG Ready HR Software Consulting (7)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/ukg-ready-hr-software-consulting)
- [Unanet (35)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/unanet)
- [Vlog (41)](https://info.redstonegci.com/blog/topic/vlog)

### Disclaimer

```
Data published on our website, such as our white papers, blogs and other government contracting commentary reflect our interpretations and opinions of current events and regulations, at the time such data is published, and the perspectives/opinions of other professionals in our industry may vary from our own.  Further, our commentary and perspectives do not reflect legal analyses, since we are not attorneys, but rather government contracts and accounting advisors.  We therefore make no representation that the use of our published information will insulate a company from government challenges, nor otherwise ensure a successful defense on any government procurement adverse action.  Readers agree that articles or blog commentary presented within our website shall not be replicated or re-published without requesting before publication in another medium, and our expressed written consent to do so.
```

**Redstone Government Consulting**  
501 Madison Street SE, Suite 100  
Huntsville, AL 35801

**Phone: ** [256.704.9800](tel:2567049800)  
**Email Us**[ info@redstonegci.com](mailto:info@redstonegci.com)

**[PAY INVOICE](https://redstonegci.com/invoice-payment/)**  
[PCI DSS compliance documentation](https://redstonegci.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/pci_dss_self_assessment_certificate.pdf)

<http://www.facebook.com/redstonegci> <http://www.twitter.com/RedstoneGCI> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/redstone-government-consulting-inc-> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQv3eAwiPTTQAnoy7hnUwgg>

© 2026 Redstone Government Consulting | All Rights Reserved | [Privacy Policy](https://redstonegci.com/privacy-policy/) | [Event Refund / Cancellation Policy](https://redstonegci.com/event-refund-cancellation-policy/)