DCAA recently published its 2012 Year in Review which highlighted the fact that DCAA’s net savings was $4.2 billion (the highest in Agency history) and representing a ROI of $6.70 for every dollar “invested”. The terminology and the 30 page report are written as if taxpayers are stockholders and DCAA is reporting to those stockholders. For the record, DCAA’s net savings are unaudited as are every other statistic included in the report.
The 30 page report is clearly not a report to stockholders because DCAA’s report is full of self-aggrandizing hyperboles which appear to be fictional work as opposed to anything representing a factual, balanced report on DCAA. For example, DCAA highlights and takes credit for increasing its incurred cost audits issued by “six-fold” over 2011; however, 2011 was a totally embarrassing year wherein DCAA could only complete a miserably low 349 incurred cost audits. No one should declare success when that success is merely a comparison to the worst year ever.
In self-serving fashion, DCAA only reports its 2012 equitable adjustments/terminations where it examined $6.4 billion and questioned $.405 billion. In contrast, in 2011, DCAA examined $2.5 billion and questioned $1.0 billion (exceptions in 2011 which were 2.5 times higher than 2012). Similarly, DCAA makes note of the fact that in 2012 its 4,492 auditors issued 6,700 audit reports, but fails to report any comparison to 2011 when 4,225 auditors issued 7,000 audit reports. Unlike “real financial statement reports” DCAA chose to “overlook” reporting comparative data if the trend was unfavorable; Oops!
And finally, one of many DCAA statements which simply defy logic and can’t pass the “sniff test” in terms of having any basis in fact: “Importantly the contractor agreed with the majority of DCAA’s findings because they understood and trusted DCAA’s process for identifying the exceptions”…..Seriously?