RGCI - Cost Accounting Standard (CAS) 409 - Depreciation of Tangible Capital Assets

Cost Accounting Standard (CAS) 409 provides the criteria for assigning costs (i.e., depreciation) of tangible capital assets to cost accounting periods and allocating those costs to contracts in an objective and consistent manner.

CAS 409 does not address the amortization of intangible capital assets (e.g., software).

What are the Requirements of CAS 409?

The fundamental requirements of CAS 409 are:

  • The depreciable cost of a tangible capital asset is the capitalized cost less its estimated residual value.
  • The estimated service life of a tangible capital asset is used to determine the cost accounting periods to which the depreciable cost will be assigned.
  • The method of depreciation should reflect the pattern of consumption the tangible capital asset over its estimated service life.
  • Any gain or loss is assigned to the cost accounting period in which the tangible capital asset is dispositioned.

Depreciation is a charge to current operations for the cost of the use of tangible capital assets during that cost accounting period.

CAS 409 requires a written policy that is consistently applied.

What if I Don’t Have Any Contracts Subject to Full CAS?

Contractors that do not have any contracts subject to CAS 409, follow FAR 31.205-11 Depreciation and FAR 31.205-16 Gain or loss on disposition or impairment of depreciable property or other capital assets which we will address later.

Estimated Residual Values

CAS 409 requires estimated residual values that exceed ten percent of the capitalized cost of the asset to be used in determining the depreciable value of the asset when using the straight-line depreciation method. Estimated residual values are not required when using the declining balance or sum of the year digits method. What we find is that contractors do not always document its records when the estimated residual is less than 10 percent. DCAA is quick to cite a CAS noncompliance when the policy is silent and residual values are not addressed. It is a best practice for contractors to state in its policy that when the estimated residual value is 10 percent or more of the capitalization cost, the capitalization cost will be reduced by the estimated residual value. We recommend that annually the contractor review its asset dispositions to average residual values by asset type.

Estimated Service Lives

When CAS 409 is applicable, contractors need to ensure the estimated services lives reflect the actual period of usefulness, not just rely on the services lives from IRS regulations or financial accounting. Contractors should be reviewing the actual useful lives of asset groupings based on retirements or withdrawal from use. A dead giveaway to DCAA is an asset register full of fully depreciated assets. A best practice would be to identify assets that are not in use during an annual inventory and disposition them (e.g., sell, scrap, etc.). It is important that contractors maintain records of retirements or withdrawals of assets to support useful lives.

NOTE – Contractors do not have to revise service lives for assets acquired prior to compliance with CAS 409.

Method of Depreciation

CAS 409 states for Government contract costing, contractors can use the method of depreciation used for financial accounting purposes unless the method does not reflect the expected consumption of services, or it is unacceptable for federal income taxes. If the financial accounting method of depreciation does not reflect consumption, other methods such as accelerated methods or surrogate methods (e.g., hours, units produced, etc.) can be used.

Gain or Loss on Disposition

When an asset is sold or disposed of, any gain or loss is assigned as an adjustment to depreciation costs in the period of disposition. Gains are limited to the difference between the original acquisition cost of the asset and its net book value. For example, in year one a truck is purchased for $28,000, depreciation $4,000 and NBV is $24,000. At the beginning of year two, the truck is sold for $30,000. While the difference between the amount received ($30,000) and the net book value ($24,000) is $6,000, the gain is limited to $4,000 the difference between the acquisition cost and the net book value.

What if I Don’t Have Any Contracts Subject to Full CAS?

Contractors that do not have any contracts subject to CAS 409 would follow the guidance in FAR 31.205-11 Depreciation and FAR 31.205-16 Gains and losses on disposition or impairment of depreciable property. FAR 31.205-11 states the allowable depreciation shall not exceed the amount used for financial accounting purposes when a contractor does not have full-CAS covered contracts subject to CAS 409. The largest difference between FAR 31.205-11 and CAS 409 is that the depreciation method and estimated useful life can be the same as for financial accounting vs. tracking and using the actual useful life. Residual values expected to exceed 10 percent of the asset cost needs to be used in establishing the depreciable costs, same as CAS 409.

FAR 31.205-16 contains similar language to CAS 409 on gains and losses. Gains and losses are the difference between the net amount realized and the undepreciated balance and is an adjustment to depreciation costs in the period received.

Takeaways

Government contractors should:

  • Ensure they have a written policy addressing capitalization and depreciation tangible capital assets.
  • Maintain historical records and market research to support estimated residual values and useful lives.
  • Perform annual asset register reviews to clean up and dispose of assets no longer in use.

One positive thing is that CAS 409 does not require you to change the depreciation methods or estimated service lives for assets acquired prior to compliance with this standard.

Redstone GCI can assist your company with various aspects of compliance and training. We offer services such as assessing your actual depreciation accounting practice for compliance with CAS 409 and determining the actual useful lives of asset groupings. Additionally, we can draft written policies and procedures, assist with responses to DCAA audit findings or ACO determinations of CAS 409 noncompliance, and provide training on Cost Accounting Standards.

Written by Lynne Nalley, CPA

Lynne Nalley, CPA Lynne is a Director with Redstone Government Consulting, Inc. providing government contract consulting services to our clients primarily related to Commercial Item Determinations and support, Cost Accounting Standards, DFARS Business System Audits, Proposals, and Incurred Cost. Prior to joining Redstone Government Consulting, Lynne served in several capacities with DCAA and DCMA for over 35 years. Professional Experience Lynne began her career working with DCAA in the Honeywell Resident Office, Clearwater, FL in 1984. Lynne’s experience included various positions which involved conducting or reviewing forward proposals or rate audits, financial capability audits, progress payments, accounting and estimating systems, cost accounting standards, claims and disclosure statement reviews. She is an expert in FAR, DFARS, CAS and testified as an expert witness. Lynne assisted in drafting the commercial item guidance for DCAA Headquarters. Lynne was assigned as a Regional Technical Specialist where she provided guidance to 20 field offices on highly complex or technical issues relative to forward pricing, financial capability or progress payment issues. As an Assistant for Quality, she was involved in reviewing and ensuring audit reports were in compliance with policy and GAGAS as well as made NASBA certified presentations to the staff including but not limited to billing reviews, CAS, unallowable cost and progress payments. To enhance her experience in government contracting, Lynne accepted a position with DCMA in 2015 as part of the newly organized DCMA Cadre of Experts in the Commercial Item Group. This included performing reviews of prime contractor’s assertions and/or commercial item determinations as well as performing price analyses. Lynne was a project lead and later became a lead analyst where she engaged with the buying commands on requests and reviewed price analysis reviews performed by a team of 5 analysts. She also assisted the DCMA CPSR team relative to commercial items and co-instructed the Commercial Item Training presented to DCMA. Education Lynne earned a Bachelor of Science Degree in Accounting from the University of Central Florida. Certifications State of Florida Certified Public Accountant State of Alabama Certified Public Accountant Defense Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (DAWIA) Level III- Auditing DAWIA Level III – Contracting

About Redstone GCI

Redstone GCI is a consulting firm focused on fulfilling the needs of government contractors in all areas of compliance. With a singular mission to help contractors through the multiple layers of “red tape,” we allow contractors to focus on what they do best – support their mission with the U.S. Government. We are home to a group of consultants made up of GovCon industry professionals, CPAs, attorneys, and retired government audit and acquisition professionals.

Our focus and knowledge of audit and compliance functions administered by DCAA and DCMA will always be at the heart of what we do. However, for the past decade, we’ve strategically grown to support other areas of the government contractor back-office with that same level of focus and expertise. We’ve added expertise in contracts management, subcontract administration, proposal pricing, various software systems, HR and employment law, property administration, manufacturing, data analytics/reporting, Grant specialists, M&A, and many other areas. When we see a trend in the needs of contractors, we act to ensure we can provide the best expertise in the market to fulfill those needs.

One thing our clients can be certain of is that with the Redstone GCI Team in your corner, there is no problem too big and no issue too technical for our team to tackle.

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Proposal Cost Volume Development & Pricing, DFARS Business Systems, Government Regulations, Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)