RGCI - Are Representations (Reps) and Certifications (Certs) Required of Subcontractors

If only the Government made this an easy answer. There are some representations and certifications that you need to get from your subcontractors. However, many in both industry and the Government think the requirement for “Reps and Certs” flows down in all cases.

What Does the FAR Say?

FAR 4.12, Representations and Certifications, provides that the scope of this section of the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) requires “submission and maintenance of representations and certifications via the System for Award Management (SAM) to-

(a)  Eliminate the administrative burden for contractors of submitting the same information to various contracting offices;

(b)  Establish a common source for this information to procurement offices across the Government; and

(c)  Incorporate by reference the contractor’s representations and certifications in the awarded contract.”

No mention whatsoever of subcontracts, subcontractors, or the burden on higher-tier contractors.

What is Required of a Higher-Tier Contractor?

FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management, and 52.204-8, Annual Representations and Certifications, provide guidance on the use and requirements for the SAM as well as representations and certifications. FAR 52.204-7 requires, in general, registration in SAM when purchases are greater than the micro-purchase threshold and the contractor is submitting an offer directly with the Federal Government (i.e., as a prime contractor). FAR 52.204-8 requires an extensive listing of annual representations and certifications for all purchases where the contractor is submitting an offer directly with the Federal Government (i.e., as a prime contractor) except those for commercial products and services. FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications—Commercial Products and Commercial Services, provides annual representations and certifications for commercial products and services where the contractor is submitting an offer directly with the Federal Government (i.e., as a prime contractor). FAR 52.204-7, 52.204-8, nor 52.212-3 include a requirement for SAM registration or annual representations and certifications to be flowed down below the prime contract level.

Based on my review of the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) CPSR Guidebook, the only representations and certifications required below the prime contract level, or at least, the only ones the CPSR teams check for, are:

A Couple of Quick Side Notes:

What Do Most Higher-Tier Contractors Do?

I have found that most higher-tier contractors implement policies and procedures placing a similar onerous representations and certifications process on themselves as required of the contracting officers. All subcontractors are required to complete a lengthy list of representations and certifications or be registered in SAM.gov with current representations and certifications. This can significantly impact the number of companies willing to do business with you, especially those small businesses with limited resources to support the overwhelming number of representations and certifications.

What Should Higher-Tier Contractors Do?

As discussed above, the DCMA CPSR Guidebook significantly limits the expected number of representations and certifications. Higher-tier contractors should only address the DCMA CPSR Guidebook’s expected representations and certifications:

  • FAR 52.203-11, Certification and Disclosure Regarding Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions, and 52.203-12, Limitation on Payments to Influence Certain Federal Transactions, get one certification at the time of awarding the subcontract.
  • FAR 52.209-6, Protecting the Government’s Interest When Subcontracting With Contractors Debarred, Suspended, Proposed for Debarment, or Voluntarily Excluded, check the excluded parties listing when qualifying a new subcontractor, before sending out requests for quotes or requests for proposals, and include language (see below) in your subcontracts.
  • FAR 52.215-12, Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing Data, and 52.215-13, Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing Data-Modifications, obtain truthful cost or pricing data certification only when required.
  • FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, and 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, obtain a representation from the subcontractor as to its small business type per the criteria and size standards in 13 CFR part 121. Per FAR 52.219-8(e), the higher-tier contractor can accept a subcontractor’s representation of its size and socioeconomic status unless the Contractor has reason to question the representation. The subcontractor cannot be required to register in SAM. Additionally, the higher-tier contractor must confirm that a subcontractor is a HUBZone small business concern by accessing SAM or by accessing DSBS. Not to worry, the higher-tier contractor “acting in good faith is not liable for misrepresentations made by its subcontractors.”
  • FAR 52.230-1, Cost Accounting Standards Notices and Certification, related to Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) notices and certification, required only when the higher-tier contract or subcontract is CAS-covered.

The DCMA recommended language for debarment in subcontracts is: “By signing/acknowledging this subcontract/PO, you (subcontractor) hereby certify that you and/or any of your Principals -- are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, or declared ineligible for the award of contracts by any Federal agency.”

Because of the joys of contracting with the Federal Government, this does not end your requirements. While you are not required to get representations and certifications from your subcontractor, you are required to ensure your subcontractors comply with the many flowdown requirements you will be passing to them. For example, FAR 52.204-21, Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems, and DFARS 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting, may be required should you have to provide covered information (i.e., controlled unclassified information – CUI) to your subcontractors. This includes subcontractors providing commercial products or services, except for COTS. These clauses require the subcontractor to implement basic safeguarding requirements and possibly NIST SP 800-171 security requirements. While a representation or certification is not required, you must educate potential subcontractors of the contractual requirement that will be placed on them. It is important to ensure your subcontractors understand all the contractual flowdown requirements they will have to comply with, which are numerous.

Best Practice: Have an annual training for your subcontractors to go over any new requirements and key requirements that can get you and them into hot water.

Expert Support for Navigating Government Contract Requirements

Redstone GCI works with contractors across the United States and internationally to help them understand government requirements and maintain an effective, compliant purchasing system. Our team assists with assessing compliance against DCMA CPSR requirements and expectations, updating and refining policies and procedures, and delivering targeted training for purchasing staff and subcontractors. We also support clients in resolving findings from government audits and reviews, helping to mitigate risk and maintain operational efficiency. Through our Contracts and Subcontracts services, we provide guidance that enables contractors to meet regulatory obligations, strengthen internal processes, and maintain readiness for oversight at every stage of the contract lifecycle.

Written by John C. Shire, CPA

John C. Shire, CPA John is a Director with Redstone Government Consulting, Inc. providing government contract consulting services to our clients primarily related to the DFARS business systems, CAS Disclosure Statements, and DCAA/DCMA compliance preparation, advisory, and defense. Prior to joining Redstone Government Consulting, John served in a number of capacities with DCAA/DCMA for more than 30 years. Upon his retirement, he was based in Texas as an SES-level Corporate Audit Director for DCAA, managing a staff of 300 auditors at one of the largest DOD programs. Professional Experience John began his career in the late 80s working in the Clearwater, FL audit office and over the next three decades he progressed through a number of positions within both DCAA and DCMA with career highlights as DCAA Program Manager at Ft. Belvoir, Chief of Technical Programs Division, Deputy Assistant Director-Policy, Director of the DCMA Cost and Pricing Center, the SES-level Lockheed Martin Corporate Audit Director, and Director of Integrity and Quality Assurance. John’s three decades of experience in performing and leading DCAA auditors and DCMA reviewers provides a wealth of expertise to our clients. John’s role, not only in the performance of audits, but also in the development of audit policy affords him unique insights into the defense of audit findings and the linkage of audit program steps to the underlying regulatory framework. He is an expert in FAR, DFARS, and other agency acquisition regulation, as well as a subject matter expert in the Cost Accounting Standards having reviewed and provided audit feedback on many of the largest and most complex cost accounting practices during his tenure with the DCAA. John’s tenure with DCAA and DCMA came at a critical time during each agency’s history where a number of changes were occurring such as the response to the ICS backlog, development of audit approaches to the DFARS Business Systems and implementation of new audit initiatives as a result of Congressional oversight through the NDAA process. John’s leadership at the DCMA Cost & Pricing center saw oversight of all major DOD pricing actions, leadership of should cost review teams, the Commercial Pricing group and many other areas of strategic value to our clients. His involvement in these and other Agency initiatives is of great value to our clients due to his in depth understanding of DCAA and DCMA’s internal policy directives. Education John holds a Master of Business Administration and a B.A. in Accounting from the University of South Florida. Certifications Certified Information Systems Auditor State of Alabama Certified Public Accountant

About Redstone GCI

Redstone GCI is a consulting firm focused on fulfilling the needs of government contractors in all areas of compliance. With a singular mission to help contractors through the multiple layers of “red tape,” we allow contractors to focus on what they do best – support their mission with the U.S. Government. We are home to a group of consultants made up of GovCon industry professionals, CPAs, attorneys, and retired government audit and acquisition professionals.

Our focus and knowledge of audit and compliance functions administered by DCAA and DCMA will always be at the heart of what we do. However, for the past decade, we’ve strategically grown to support other areas of the government contractor back-office with that same level of focus and expertise. We’ve added expertise in contracts management, subcontract administration, proposal pricing, various software systems, HR and employment law, property administration, manufacturing, data analytics/reporting, Grant specialists, M&A, and many other areas. When we see a trend in the needs of contractors, we act to ensure we can provide the best expertise in the market to fulfill those needs.

One thing our clients can be certain of is that with the Redstone GCI Team in your corner, there is no problem too big and no issue too technical for our team to tackle.

Topics: Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, DFARS Business Systems, DCAA Audit Support, Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR), Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)