gross negligence government contracting

In a recent Federal Circuit ruling, KBR found out that “simple negligence” in its calculations of a reasonable price range for subcontractor’s price proposal resulted in a “Gross Negligence ruling” by the courts. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. (KBR) v. U.S., No. 203-5030, slip op. (Fed. Cir. Feb, 3, 2014).

KBR was awarded a cost reimbursement US Army contract for services, to include food services, in Iraq, and KBR subcontracted out the food services portion of the prime contract. After the initial award, the scope of food services requirements was doubled by the Army which required the subcontractor and KBR to recalculate the potential costs for the increased in the number of troops to be fed. KBR’s subcontract negotiator made a mathematical error in its formula for calculating the potential costs of the additional food services.  This error in KBR calculation resulting in quadrupling the potential cost range from which KBR would evaluate the subcontractor’s cost proposal for the additional services

Subsequently, KBR received a proposal from the subcontractor that actually tripled their initial cost estimate instead of doubling to meet the Army’s new requirements for the number of troops requiring dining services.  According to the Court, KBR knew of the error in its cost calculation formula, yet went ahead and used the flawed cost range to evaluate the reasonableness of the subcontractor’s proposal. 

Therefore when evaluating the subcontractor’s proposed cost increase, the subcontractor’s  tripling of costs was within the range of potential costs increase calculated by KBR and KBR approved the subcontract’s costs increase which were eventually billed to the government for the additional dining services.  The excess billing was disallowed by the Government and KBR sought recovery for the disallowed cost.

The Federal Circuit ruled that KBR’s negligence in using a known flawed cost formula in evaluating the subcontractor’s proposed costs and the subsequently inflated billed costs “arose out of grossly negligent mistakes.” What does this ruling mean to your company? That known simple mathematical errors left uncorrected maybe considered “Gross Negligence” and result in significant financial risk to your company. Therefore it is imperative that companies take the necessary steps to ensure that its cost proposal calculations are free of any and all mathematical errors.

Written by Tim Di Guiseppe

Tim Di Guiseppe Redstone Government Consulting Blog articles written by Tim Di Guiseppe

About Redstone GCI

Redstone GCI is a consulting firm focused on fulfilling the needs of government contractors in all areas of compliance. With a singular mission to help contractors through the multiple layers of “red tape,” we allow contractors to focus on what they do best – support their mission with the U.S. Government. We are home to a group of consultants made up of GovCon industry professionals, CPAs, attorneys, and retired government audit and acquisition professionals.

Our focus and knowledge of audit and compliance functions administered by DCAA and DCMA will always be at the heart of what we do. However, for the past decade, we’ve strategically grown to support other areas of the government contractor back-office with that same level of focus and expertise. We’ve added expertise in contracts management, subcontract administration, proposal pricing, various software systems, HR and employment law, property administration, manufacturing, data analytics/reporting, Grant specialists, M&A, and many other areas. When we see a trend in the needs of contractors, we act to ensure we can provide the best expertise in the market to fulfill those needs.

One thing our clients can be certain of is that with the Redstone GCI Team in your corner, there is no problem too big and no issue too technical for our team to tackle.

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Proposal Cost Volume Development & Pricing, Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE)