Schedule I is the most important part of the Incurred Cost Submission and is the single area of great interest for the Government and its auditors. This VLOG will briefly explain the Incurred Cost Submission, the importance of Schedule I, and how to resolve potential issues.

The incurred cost submission goes by many names/acronyms including final indirect rate proposal, incurred cost electronic submission, indirect cost rate submission, incurred cost proposal, ICES, ICS or ICP. Regardless of name, it is simply the mechanism for the true up of your actual indirect cost to the indirect costs provisionally billed for in a single contractor fiscal year. An ICS must be submitted for each business unit of a contractor that holds applicable contracts subject to the Allowable Cost and Payment clause (FAR 52.216-7) and is required to be submitted 6-months after fiscal year end.

What are the Incurred Cost Submission Schedules?

Within the Incurred Cost Submission, there are many worksheets or tabs in an Excel workbook that are referred to as “schedules.” The contract costs presented on Schedule H and Schedule K and all the indirect rates calculated in Schedules A through E are represented in Schedule I.

What is Schedule I of the Incurred Cost Submission?

This schedule provides useful information for contractors, auditors, and the Contracting Officer. It includes prior year actual costs and current year total actual costs for each cost type and time and material contracts contract to date. The total cumulative costs for those contracts are compared to the cumulative billed amounts to determine the over- or under- billed amount. Essentially, this schedule answers the most important question when managing a cost reimbursable contract – do I owe or does the customer owe me? If over billed then the contractor will need to work with their customer to pay back the costs in excess of what was billed. If under billed then the contractor is owed money for costs that exceed the billed amount. Schedule I is important because it is the place in the Incurred Cost Submission that shows each project’s over- or under-billed amount. As a result, this is the focus area for the Government during an audit and can cause a significant headache if it is not properly completed.

Auditors use this schedule not only to audit the Contractor costs incurred but to assess for penalties against contractors. If a contractor claims a cost that is expressly unallowable per FAR 31 cost principles, then penalties will be assessed for settlement of the proposal. It is important that Contractors perform regular reviews to ensure unallowable costs are properly accounted for in your books of record. Any indirect unallowable costs should be adjusted out in the appropriate schedule and not claimed.   

For contracts that are ready to close, Schedule I provides the Contractor with the actual cost information required by the Contracting Officer during contract closeout for each cost reimbursable contract. This schedule and the information include in it assists with the preparation of the final invoice voucher for contract closeout.

At the end of the day, Schedule I is the most important part of the Incurred Cost Submission in the eyes of the Government and they will pay close attention to the presentation of the cumulative costs and cumulative billings for each project. Redstone GCI is available to assist contractor’s in assessing their incurred cost as adequate or inadequate as well as assist in the development of the proposal. Redstone GCI assists contractors throughout the U.S. and internationally with understanding the Government’s expectations in applying FAR Part 31, Cost Principles and completing incurred cost proposal requirements.

Written by Adam Cole

Adam Cole Adam is a Senior Consultant with Redstone Government Consulting, Inc. based in our firm’s Huntsville office. Adam supports our government compliance group and his role includes production of pricing models for cost volume proposals, the preparation of complex incurred cost submissions, data modeling and analysis related to indirect rates, and unallowable cost testing. Adam works closely with our directors and managers in performing testing and assessments of DFARS Business Systems, specializing in the accounting system. He also works with other team members to assist clients with compliance requirements of the U.S. Government. Education Adam holds a B.S. degree in Economics from The University of Alabama with minors in Computing Technology & Applications and Management Communication.

About Redstone GCI

Redstone GCI is a consulting firm focused on fulfilling the needs of government contractors in all areas of compliance. With a singular mission to help contractors through the multiple layers of “red tape,” we allow contractors to focus on what they do best – support their mission with the U.S. Government. We are home to a group of consultants made up of GovCon industry professionals, CPAs, attorneys, and retired government audit and acquisition professionals.

Our focus and knowledge of audit and compliance functions administered by DCAA and DCMA will always be at the heart of what we do. However, for the past decade, we’ve strategically grown to support other areas of the government contractor back-office with that same level of focus and expertise. We’ve added expertise in contracts management, subcontract administration, proposal pricing, various software systems, HR and employment law, property administration, manufacturing, data analytics/reporting, Grant specialists, M&A, and many other areas. When we see a trend in the needs of contractors, we act to ensure we can provide the best expertise in the market to fulfill those needs.

One thing our clients can be certain of is that with the Redstone GCI Team in your corner, there is no problem too big and no issue too technical for our team to tackle.

Topics: Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE), Vlog