dcaa-auditing-changes-redstone

Many of us who have retired from DCAA as well as contractors like to discuss the “good old days” before DCAA audits became marathons and helping contractors was not forbidden.  As DCAA became more demanding and intrusive, the preferred alternative for a contractor was to be subjected to the less-intrusive review by DCMA.  Now it appears that contractors may soon be longing for the “good old days” of DCMA as well.

A few recent DCMA actions brought up memories of the new DCAA.  First, was the receipt by a client of a 3 page, 22 item letter requesting information for a financial capability evaluation – due in 15 days.  Second was a report issued by the Contractor Purchasing System Review (CPSR) Team which cited as a “significant deficiency” the lack of a policy related to requirements that were not applicable to the company.  Third, a contractor’s forward pricing (bid) rates were going to be reviewed by DCMA, but first the contractor had to complete an adequacy checklist (not required by any regulation, but borrowed from DCAA).

For at least the last 35 years, there have been rumors that DCAA would be merged into DCMA.  Now it seems that that DCAA and DCMA are blending together, unofficially.  DCMA, in some cases staffed by former DCAA auditors, now performs reviews of purchasing systems, earned value management system reviews, forward pricing proposals, disclosure statements, financial capability, and forward pricing rate proposals, all of which used to be performed by DCAA.  The biggest difference in what DCAA used to do and what DCMA now does, is that DCMA does not call them audits and does not perform them in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAGAS).

As DCMA takes over more and more of the work that DCAA used to perform, the similarities between the Agencies seem to increase.  It now appears that DCMA is following DCAA’s lead in performing system reviews by following a checklist.  If anything on the checklist is missing, there is a significant deficiency, which makes the system inadequate.  This has been a problem for as long as there have been system reviews – but typically limited to reports coming from DCAA.

Bottom line – anyone longing for the “good old days” in terms of the experience of dealing with the new DCAA, just needs to go through the experience of dealing with the new DCMA.  They will feel right at home.

Written by Redstone Team

About Redstone GCI

Redstone GCI is a consulting firm focused on fulfilling the needs of government contractors in all areas of compliance. With a singular mission to help contractors through the multiple layers of “red tape,” we allow contractors to focus on what they do best – support their mission with the U.S. Government. We are home to a group of consultants made up of GovCon industry professionals, CPAs, attorneys, and retired government audit and acquisition professionals.

Our focus and knowledge of audit and compliance functions administered by DCAA and DCMA will always be at the heart of what we do. However, for the past decade, we’ve strategically grown to support other areas of the government contractor back-office with that same level of focus and expertise. We’ve added expertise in contracts management, subcontract administration, proposal pricing, various software systems, HR and employment law, property administration, manufacturing, data analytics/reporting, Grant specialists, M&A, and many other areas. When we see a trend in the needs of contractors, we act to ensure we can provide the best expertise in the market to fulfill those needs.

One thing our clients can be certain of is that with the Redstone GCI Team in your corner, there is no problem too big and no issue too technical for our team to tackle.

Topics: DFARS Business Systems, DCAA Audit Support