RGCI-Maintaining Adequate Policies and Procedures for Government Contracts

On December 18, 2018 the Administrative Judge, in ASBCA No. 61583, denied the contractor’s appeal and granted the Government’s request for summary judgement related to the contractor’s claim that it was entitled to a penalty waiver because the contractor did not demonstrate that it “had adequate policies, training, controls, and review systems, and that it inadvertently incorporated the [unallowable cost]” in its incurred cost proposals. This decision serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining adequate policies and procedures.

Policies and Procedures You Really Need to Focus On

For larger contractors covered by Cost Accounting Standards or subject to the Business System rules in DFARS 252.242-7006, written policies and procedures are specifically required in the regulatory guidance. For other contractors, although there is no specific regulatory requirement requiring formal written policies and procedures, the policies and procedures or lack thereof will certainly be considered by the Government when assessing accounting system adequacy. Generally, the Government, at a minimum, will expect policies and procedures, if applicable/costs are significant for:

  • Estimating
  • Overall accounting system/GAAP compliance
  • Timekeeping & labor distribution
  • Cost segregation of direct and indirect costs
  • Incentive compensation (bonuses)
  • Purchasing
  • Ethics
  • Travel & relocation
  • Accounting for unallowable costs
  • Capitalization & depreciation of tangible assets
  • Subcontract award and management

Why Polices and Procedures?

The purpose of policies and procedures are to promote achievement of organization objectives, help ensure consistency and compliance with regulatory requirements, prevent errors, and provide for appropriate business decisions. Policies and procedures are unique to each organization based on its needs and objectives and there is no one size fits all. Regulations do not specify the level of detail required for policies and procedures or provide specific criteria for defining adequacy. In general, the larger and more complex the organization, the more detailed policies and procedures the Government will expect the contractor to have. However, contractors also need to recognize that they will be held accountable for any requirement included in their policies and procedures.

More Does Not Always Mean Better

More complex policies and procedures may have a greater likelihood of noncompliance. In developing policies and procedures, contractors should avoid either adding additional requirements over and above the regulatory requirements or including any policies and procedures they do not intend to follow. With respect to the level of detail, no policy and procedure can consider every possible circumstance the contractor may face, so contractors should make sure the policies and procedures are flexible enough to ensure decision makers can make the right business decisions. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to defend the failure to follow your own policies and procedures in negotiations with the Government.

Reviewing Policies and Procedures

We recommend contractors review their policies and procedures at least annually to ensure they are adequate for compliance with government contract requirements, reflect actual behaviors and practices expected by management, and provide for appropriate business decisions.

Redstone is happy to assist with adequacy and compliance reviews of existing policies and procedures, policy and procedure revisions, and developing new policies and procedures where necessary.

Written by Redstone Team

About Redstone GCI

Redstone GCI is a consulting firm focused on fulfilling the needs of government contractors in all areas of compliance. With a singular mission to help contractors through the multiple layers of “red tape,” we allow contractors to focus on what they do best – support their mission with the U.S. Government. We are home to a group of consultants made up of GovCon industry professionals, CPAs, attorneys, and retired government audit and acquisition professionals.

Our focus and knowledge of audit and compliance functions administered by DCAA and DCMA will always be at the heart of what we do. However, for the past decade, we’ve strategically grown to support other areas of the government contractor back-office with that same level of focus and expertise. We’ve added expertise in contracts management, subcontract administration, proposal pricing, various software systems, HR and employment law, property administration, manufacturing, data analytics/reporting, Grant specialists, M&A, and many other areas. When we see a trend in the needs of contractors, we act to ensure we can provide the best expertise in the market to fulfill those needs.

One thing our clients can be certain of is that with the Redstone GCI Team in your corner, there is no problem too big and no issue too technical for our team to tackle.

Topics: Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, Government Regulations