This video and article are the first of a two-part series where we provide an overview of the Department of Labor (DoL) position on independent contractor classifications. This series presents a mock audit to give you a first-hand perspective of the types of questions that DoL investigators ask with regard to the all too common issue of whether or not your workers are properly classified under the law. We will provide "red flags" that are often key to the final determination of Department of Labor, and how to address them.

Earlier this year, on February 1st, the United States Department of Labor announced that its Wage and Hour Division was going to hire 100 additional investigators to support its enforcement efforts, including the protection of workers' wages, migrant and seasonal workers, rights to family medical leave, and prevailing wage requirements for workers on federal contracts, such as the Service Contract Act and Davis-Bacon. In the fiscal year 2021, the Wage and Hour Division collected $230 million in wages owed to 190,000 workers. As part of this initiative, the Department of Labor's Wage and Hour Division continues to focus on ensuring that workers are properly classified as employees versus independent contractors or consultants.

The misclassification of workers as 1099 contractors or consultants versus W-2 employees is an ongoing problem under federal and state laws. How to ensure proper classification has been a debate that spans past and current administrations. In fact, I have addressed this debate in several past articles.

In this video and article, we will listen in on a mock investigation of an investigator from the Department of Labor who is interviewing a representative of a fictitious company we will call Acme Enterprise Inc. The investigators' questions are some of the standard ones that are asked during audits by the Federal Department of Labor and State Departments of Labor.

Thank you for providing the records requested in our letter to you. For purposes of this audit, we are only focused on 2021.

What is your name and position?

My name is John Martin, and I am the comptroller for Acme Enterprises Incorporated.

I need to follow up on a few issues I have related to the documents you provided. In particular, I have questions about Mr. Joe Smith, who was listed as a 1099 contractor in your 2021 records. What services did Mr. Smith provide to Acme in 2021?

Yes, Mr. Smith is an independent contractor who does work for us. He performed engineering services in 2021 for our customer under one of our government contracts.

Were the services he provided in 2021 similar to or outside of the scope of the services typically provided to your company?

We have several employees who actually do perform the same services for our customer as Mr. Smith. However, Mr. Smith prefers to work as an outside slash independent consultant as he is semi-retired and does not need benefits.

Unfortunately, government agencies do not care what Mr. Smith or workers prefer. If he is performing pretty much the same services as your other employees rather than a service that your company doesn't even offer, then the auditors are likely to find that Mr. Smith is your employee, and they would reclassify him as such.

Does Mr. Smith have his own business set up to provide services such as those he provided to your company?

I don't know.

Do you know whether Mr. Smith has a business license or a company EIN employer identification number?

I do not know if Mr. Smith has a business license, but he did not use an EIN number for his work with us. He uses his social security number for us to pay him.

Did Mr. Smith provide his own equipment, supplies, and materials?

No, we issued him a laptop for him to use to perform his work for our customer. He does use his own cell phone, though.

Do you know whether Mr. Smith advertises his services to the public, such as through a website, or whether he has business cards with his logo?

I have no idea.

Auditors from the federal and state departments of labor really like to see workers who have been classified as 1099 contractors with their own business set up. They'll ask questions such as those we've gone over here as well as do they provide the same or similar services to other customers or is your company the only company that they work for providing these services. Each of these questions alone may not be dispositive to the auditor's decision as to whether Mr. Smith is an independent contractor or should be reclassified as your employee, but one that they seem to really focus on is the question of whether they use their EIN or their social security number in order for you to pay them.

Did Mr. Smith set his own hours and rates when he performed these services in 2021?

Please see Part 2 of this video and article for the remainder of the mock investigation.

Written by Jamie Brabston, JD

Jamie Brabston, JD Jamie Brabston is a Director & Legal Counsel with Redstone Government Consulting, Inc. (Redstone GCI), specializing in Labor and Employment Law, with an emphasis on government contract law and compliance. Prior to joining Redstone GCI, Jamie was Senior Counsel with Lehr Middlebrooks Vreeland & Thompson, P.C., a boutique labor and employment law firm based in Birmingham, AL. Jamie assists employers with compliance, problem prevention, the analysis of complex employment law and contract related issues, as well as conducting investigations related to all types of employee complaints. In addition, Jamie works with employers in responding to complaints filed with external agencies such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the United States Department of Labor (Wage & Hour, OSHA and the OFCCP), as well as state Departments of Labor. Jamie also provides litigation support as needed. In addition, Jamie advises federal government contractors with contract specific requirements such as affirmative action compliance, Service Contract Act and Davis Bacon, FAR requirements for ethics policies and awareness programs, the Drug Free Workplace Act and related record keeping. Jamie often assists contractors in performing mock compliance assessments to ensure they are prepared in the event of an audit or investigation. Jamie is a proficient trainer and speaker and is a primary instructor for the Federal Publications Seminars course, “HR for Government Contractors.” Additionally, Jamie regularly conducts training and education for individual employers and their employees on non-discrimination and anti-harassment, as well as training sessions for executive and non-executive management on a wide variety of overall management leadership skills, and government contract specific topics. Jamie also specializes and advises clients on employee benefits issues including ERISA welfare benefit plans, HIPAA, wellness plans, COBRA, the Affordable Care Act, and other federal and state laws, including related reporting requirements. Professional Experience In addition to her experience with Lehr Middlebrooks Vreeland & Thompson, P.C., Jamie was an attorney and shareholder with Huntsville, AL based law firm, Lanier Ford Shaver & Payne from 1994– 2006, where she defended large and small employers, including government contractors, in litigation involving sexual harassment, retaliatory discharge, disability, age, religion, race and sex discrimination, FMLA, ERISA, invasion of privacy, negligent supervision, intentional infliction of emotional distress, fraud and breach of contract. From 2006- 2009, Jamie served as General Counsel, Vice President of Human Resources, and Corporate Secretary for Digital Fusion, Inc., a Huntsville based government contractor. In 2009, Jamie founded her own employment law compliance firm, Practical Employment Solutions, Inc., where she partnered directly with small businesses, including government contractors, to assist them with a full range of human resource and employment law compliance needs specifically targeted to prevent and correct employment law and other compliance issues before governmental audits, investigations or litigation occurred. Jamie has also represented government contractors with restrictive covenant issues, and defended a mid-size, Virginia based contractor in a lawsuit involving allegations of violations of non-competition agreements and misappropriation of trade secrets.

About Redstone GCI

Redstone GCI is a consulting firm focused on fulfilling the needs of government contractors in all areas of compliance. With a singular mission to help contractors through the multiple layers of “red tape,” we allow contractors to focus on what they do best – support their mission with the U.S. Government. We are home to a group of consultants made up of GovCon industry professionals, CPAs, attorneys, and retired government audit and acquisition professionals.

Our focus and knowledge of audit and compliance functions administered by DCAA and DCMA will always be at the heart of what we do. However, for the past decade, we’ve strategically grown to support other areas of the government contractor back-office with that same level of focus and expertise. We’ve added expertise in contracts management, subcontract administration, proposal pricing, various software systems, HR and employment law, property administration, manufacturing, data analytics/reporting, Grant specialists, M&A, and many other areas. When we see a trend in the needs of contractors, we act to ensure we can provide the best expertise in the market to fulfill those needs.

One thing our clients can be certain of is that with the Redstone GCI Team in your corner, there is no problem too big and no issue too technical for our team to tackle.

Topics: Human Resources, Vlog