DOE Contracts Redstone Government Consulting

The Department of Energy (DOE) has released its proposed amendments to the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulations (DEAR) which would subject certain DOE contracts to business systems criteria and penalties for failure to maintain adequate internal controls governing those systems.  The proposed rule, published on April 1 2014, makes official a DOE FY 2013 promise of implementing formal regulations which would mirror systems requirements already in place for DOD contracts, those systems of which are defined in DFARS 252.242-7005.

In its introductory verbiage, the proposed rule supports the need for a more rigid contactor business system regulatory process given that “weak control systems increase the risk of unallowable and unreasonable costs” that would be charged to the government.  

Unlike the DFARS business system regulations, the proposed DOE would implement systems criteria for only five sets of systems, as opposed to six systems addressed in the DOD guidelines.  The DOE proposal would require contractors to maintain adequate systems for property management, accounting system administration, estimating, Earned Value Management (EVMS), and purchasing practices.  The proposed rule does not include regulatory parameters for a material management and accounting system, the “sixth system” which is addressed within the DFARS business systems regulations.

Implemented rules would generally apply only to contracts which exceed $50 million awarded to large businesses.  Where contracts covered by the rules are reimbursable, Time and Material, Labor Hour, incentive type or subject to performance based payments,   DOE would be able to withhold interim invoiced amounts when significant systems deficiencies are found until satisfactory corrective action is completed by the contractor.  Exempt from the proposed business systems criteria at this point are Management and Operating contracts, which will be covered under a separate rule.

Certain verbiage included within the April 1 proposed rule may require future clarification, specifically as to contracts covered or affected by the business systems rules, going beyond the $50 million award to large businesses general criteria.  For example, within the Background section, the dialogue states that the business system rules would apply to “designated fixed price contracts awarded to a large business on the basis of adequate price competition without submission of cost or pricing data”, and “covered” contracts subject to the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS).  Similar to the DFARS business system final rules, the DOE may intend that only CAS covered contracts be subject to a “withholding” provision of the new rules; however, public comments and later changes that filter into a final rule will likely clarify the contracts that are affected by the new rules when implemented, and to which contracts a payment withholding may be executed.

Written by Darryl Walker

Darryl Walker Darryl Walker is a Emeritus Advisor for Government Compliance with Redstone Government Consulting, Inc., and formerly served as an Owner and Technical Director for the Beason & Nalley Government contract consulting group for over ten years. He provides content for our Government Insights Newsletter, provides training courses to government contractor and business community leaders, and consults with government contractors regarding a vast range of issues including cost proposals and presentations, internal controls, proposal preparation, compliance with the FAR and Cost Accounting Standards, litigation support, specialized claims, defective pricing issues, liaison with procurement and DCAA audit officials, and accounting and management systems compliance. Prior to joining Redstone Government Consulting, Darryl worked with the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) for almost 34 years in a variety of technical and management capacities. During his tenure with DCAA, Darryl provided audit services to a wide range of government agencies, including the Department of Defense, NASA, Department of Energy, Department of Interior, General Services Administration, and Department of Justice. During his experience with DCAA, Darryl audited over 3,000 government contractors throughout the Southeastern United States, Europe, and the Middle East. Education Darryl is a graduate of Texas Wesleyan College with a major in accounting and minor in economics.

About Redstone GCI

Redstone GCI is a consulting firm focused on fulfilling the needs of government contractors in all areas of compliance. With a singular mission to help contractors through the multiple layers of “red tape,” we allow contractors to focus on what they do best – support their mission with the U.S. Government. We are home to a group of consultants made up of GovCon industry professionals, CPAs, attorneys, and retired government audit and acquisition professionals.

Our focus and knowledge of audit and compliance functions administered by DCAA and DCMA will always be at the heart of what we do. However, for the past decade, we’ve strategically grown to support other areas of the government contractor back-office with that same level of focus and expertise. We’ve added expertise in contracts management, subcontract administration, proposal pricing, various software systems, HR and employment law, property administration, manufacturing, data analytics/reporting, Grant specialists, M&A, and many other areas. When we see a trend in the needs of contractors, we act to ensure we can provide the best expertise in the market to fulfill those needs.

One thing our clients can be certain of is that with the Redstone GCI Team in your corner, there is no problem too big and no issue too technical for our team to tackle.

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Small Business Compliance, Government Compliance Training