NDAA contractor cap Redstone

With the House of Representatives having passed its version of the FY 2014 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), as well as a federal budget agreement, both of which establish new guidelines and annual ceilings on allowable government contractor executive salaries, the question is what will the Senate do with both agreements when they address those specific revised caps. Moreover, because the House-passed federal budget and the NDAA have different annual compensation caps and contractor personnel to which these caps would be applicable, will these differences be reconciled in final versions of both budget and NDAA agreement?

Several days ago, House representatives finalized its version of the NDAA and agreed to set the annual compensation which the government would be willing to reimburse under Department of Defense (DOD) contracts, which incorporate the FAR Part 31 Cost Principles, at $625,000. The ceiling would be applicable to all contractor employees (not just top five executives), except for certain classifications to be approved by agency heads, and the basis for future annual escalation adjustments would be based on the Employment Cost Index. The House approved ceiling is substantially lower than the new approved FAR compensation cap of $952,000, established by the OMB for government fiscal year 2012.

When passing its version of the FY 2014 federal budget, however, the House established a different compensation cap at $487,000, ostensibly applicable to all government and subcontractor contractor employees (civilian and DOD), with different labor skill classification exemptions that those stipulated for DOD in the NDAA. Both the NDAA and the federal budget contractor cost limitations would be applicable to government contracts awarded 180 days after both agreements become law.

Assuming that the Senate was to approve both House agreements, with different allowable government contractor employee ceilings an employees to which ceilings are applicable, the legislators have two choices to consider in marrying the two different ceilings and the contractor people to which they would apply: do nothing, leave it to the intuitive thinking of procurement agencies (or the FAR councils) on how to administer two separate compensation caps applicable to the same contractors/contracts, which would undoubtedly turn into a major disaster story for affected contractors, or; compromise and agree to a single cap for both federal budget and NDAA administration purposes, which we believe will occur when the Senate takes up debate on the House bills.

Notwithstanding the House approved bills, the Senate has yet to make up its mind on reasonable employee annual allowable compensation that can be passed on by contractors through cost based government contracts and be shared in by the government. More conservative contractor compensation ceiling proposals pontificated by Senate members are still alive, such as lower annual caps at $400,000 (President’s salary), and $230,700 (Vice-President’s salary).

Beware government contractors: whatever happens, a likely outcome of approved an signed budget and NDAA agreements will be ceilings and subsequent annual increases lower than the current $952,000 annual cap for FY 2012 and beyond and the basis on which escalation adjustments are calculated at this time.

Written by Darryl Walker

Darryl Walker Darryl Walker is a Emeritus Advisor for Government Compliance with Redstone Government Consulting, Inc., and formerly served as an Owner and Technical Director for the Beason & Nalley Government contract consulting group for over ten years. He provides content for our Government Insights Newsletter, provides training courses to government contractor and business community leaders, and consults with government contractors regarding a vast range of issues including cost proposals and presentations, internal controls, proposal preparation, compliance with the FAR and Cost Accounting Standards, litigation support, specialized claims, defective pricing issues, liaison with procurement and DCAA audit officials, and accounting and management systems compliance. Prior to joining Redstone Government Consulting, Darryl worked with the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) for almost 34 years in a variety of technical and management capacities. During his tenure with DCAA, Darryl provided audit services to a wide range of government agencies, including the Department of Defense, NASA, Department of Energy, Department of Interior, General Services Administration, and Department of Justice. During his experience with DCAA, Darryl audited over 3,000 government contractors throughout the Southeastern United States, Europe, and the Middle East. Education Darryl is a graduate of Texas Wesleyan College with a major in accounting and minor in economics.

About Redstone GCI

Redstone GCI is a consulting firm focused on fulfilling the needs of government contractors in all areas of compliance. With a singular mission to help contractors through the multiple layers of “red tape,” we allow contractors to focus on what they do best – support their mission with the U.S. Government. We are home to a group of consultants made up of GovCon industry professionals, CPAs, attorneys, and retired government audit and acquisition professionals.

Our focus and knowledge of audit and compliance functions administered by DCAA and DCMA will always be at the heart of what we do. However, for the past decade, we’ve strategically grown to support other areas of the government contractor back-office with that same level of focus and expertise. We’ve added expertise in contracts management, subcontract administration, proposal pricing, various software systems, HR and employment law, property administration, manufacturing, data analytics/reporting, Grant specialists, M&A, and many other areas. When we see a trend in the needs of contractors, we act to ensure we can provide the best expertise in the market to fulfill those needs.

One thing our clients can be certain of is that with the Redstone GCI Team in your corner, there is no problem too big and no issue too technical for our team to tackle.

Topics: Government Shutdown, Proposal Cost Volume Development & Pricing