John C. Shire, CPA

John C. Shire, CPAJohn is a Director with Redstone Government Consulting, Inc. providing government contract consulting services to our clients primarily related to the DFARS business systems, CAS Disclosure Statements, and DCAA/DCMA compliance preparation, advisory, and defense. Prior to joining Redstone Government Consulting, John served in a number of capacities with DCAA/DCMA for more than 30 years. Upon his retirement, he was based in Texas as an SES-level Corporate Audit Director for DCAA, managing a staff of 300 auditors at one of the largest DOD programs. Professional Experience John began his career in the late 80s working in the Clearwater, FL audit office and over the next three decades he progressed through a number of positions within both DCAA and DCMA with career highlights as DCAA Program Manager at Ft. Belvoir, Chief of Technical Programs Division, Deputy Assistant Director-Policy, Director of the DCMA Cost and Pricing Center, the SES-level Lockheed Martin Corporate Audit Director, and Director of Integrity and Quality Assurance. John’s three decades of experience in performing and leading DCAA auditors and DCMA reviewers provides a wealth of expertise to our clients. John’s role, not only in the performance of audits, but also in the development of audit policy affords him unique insights into the defense of audit findings and the linkage of audit program steps to the underlying regulatory framework. He is an expert in FAR, DFARS, and other agency acquisition regulation, as well as a subject matter expert in the Cost Accounting Standards having reviewed and provided audit feedback on many of the largest and most complex cost accounting practices during his tenure with the DCAA. John’s tenure with DCAA and DCMA came at a critical time during each agency’s history where a number of changes were occurring such as the response to the ICS backlog, development of audit approaches to the DFARS Business Systems and implementation of new audit initiatives as a result of Congressional oversight through the NDAA process. John’s leadership at the DCMA Cost & Pricing center saw oversight of all major DOD pricing actions, leadership of should cost review teams, the Commercial Pricing group and many other areas of strategic value to our clients. His involvement in these and other Agency initiatives is of great value to our clients due to his in depth understanding of DCAA and DCMA’s internal policy directives. Education John holds a Master of Business Administration and a B.A. in Accounting from the University of South Florida. Certifications Certified Information Systems Auditor State of Alabama Certified Public Accountant

Recent Posts

Unallowable Cost on Government Contracts

So, why is it that the Federal Government has a list of cost it will not pay for on Government contracts? These rules related to what costs the Government will pay for and what costs it will not pay for (i.e., unallowable costs) were developed around the Government’s belief that most companies doing business with the Government are not operating in a competitive market. As a result of the Government developing these unallowable costs, companies doing business with the Government have to take the unallowable cost they do incur out of the fixed amount of profit or fee the Government has agreed to pay these companies.

Read More

Topics: Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, Government Regulations

Understanding your Lower-Tier Relationships with Subrecipient and Contractor Determinations under 2 CFR 200

2 CFR 200.331, Subrecipient and contractor determinations, requires that an organization performing a grant or cooperative agreement document a case-by-case determination as to whether each sub-agreement it makes classifies the lower-tier organization in the role of a subrecipient or a contractor. The guidance provided to assist with this required determination is extremely subjective.

Read More

Topics: Government Regulations, Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200)

Recent ASBCA Decision – Understand Just What You are Getting With an IDIQ Contract

Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts often look like a big money opportunity for contractors – but looks can be deceiving. Many IDIQs are multi-awards, meaning you are just one of many contractors that may get task orders awarded under the contract. On top of that, the required minimum the Government must buy under the IDIQ is, in most cases, very low. So, it turns out that millions of dollars of anticipated business fizzles down to $2,500 – which may have a shocking impact to your return on investment.

Read More

Topics: Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

Recent ASBCA and Court of Appeals Decisions Impacting Undefinitized Contract Actions


April 25, 2023; the Court of Appeals agreed with the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) that a contractor cannot take a unilaterally established Undefinitized Contract Action (UCA) to the Board without first submitting a certified claim request for a final decision by the contracting officer.

Read More

Topics: Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

Labor Qualifications under Time and Material Contracts

All Time and Material (T&M) contracts with the Federal Government, even commercial ones under Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) part 12, have one big thing in common. That big thing is that all of the labor hours delivered must be performed by individuals meeting the labor qualifications specified in the contract. The Federal Government uses very strong language in its contract requirement related to this, stating the hours “will not be paid to the extent the work is performed by individuals that do not meet the qualifications.”

Read More

Topics: Contracts & Subcontracts Administration, Human Resources, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

DCAA Audit Programs Impacting Small Business


Starting back in 2021, DCAA issued updates to its audit programs supporting the audit of incurred cost. Here are a few interesting things we noted in the updates.

Read More

Topics: Incurred Cost Proposal Submission (ICP/ICE), DCAA Audit Support, Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR)

Procurement Standards under 2 CFR 200 for Federal Grants and Cooperative Agreements

2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200 lays out the Procurement Standards (i.e., purchasing system requirements) in section 317 to 327. 2 CFR 200.317 (Procurement by States) requires State Governments making purchases under Federal awards to use the same policies and procedures it uses for placing purchases when it spends State funds. 2 CFR 200.318 (General Procurement Standards) relates to non-Federal entities[1] other than State Governments. This section requires the non-Federal entity to have and use documented procurement procedures, consistent with laws and regulations and conform to the procurement standards identified in §§ 200.317 through 200.327.

Read More

Topics: Compliant Accounting Infrastructure, Government Regulations, Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200)

FAR Part 31 Provides Special Treatment for Construction and A&E Contracts

FAR 31.105, Construction and architect-engineer contracts, provides somewhat unique cost accounting expectations (i.e., cost principles and procedures) the Federal Government has when awarding contracts for construction management or construction, alteration or repair of buildings, bridges, roads, or other kinds of real property. It also addresses architect-engineer (A&E) contracts related to construction projects. This applies to all cost-reimbursable contracts and the pricing of contracts based on cost analysis as required by FAR 15.404-1(a)(3).

Read More

Topics: Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Federal Construction Contracting

The Hidden Competitor in Federal Construction and A&E Contracting

FAR 36.203, Government estimate of construction costs, and FAR 36.605, Government cost estimate for architect-engineer work, require the development of an independent Government estimate of the cost of construction costs and architect-engineer services when the value is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold ($250,000). The estimate shall be prepared in as much detail as though the Government were competing for award or on the basis of a detailed analysis of the required work as though the Government were submitting a proposal. Access to the Government estimate is limited to Government personnel unless during negotiations the contracting officer identifies a specialized task and discloser is deemed necessary to arrive at a fair and reasonable price.

Read More

Topics: Government Regulations, Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), Federal Construction Contracting

Internal Controls Required for Federal Grants and Cooperative Agreements

 

Organizations receiving Federal awards (i.e., grants or cooperative agreements) are required by 2 CFR 200.303(a) to “[e]stablish and maintain effective internal control over the Federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-Federal entity is managing the Federal award in compliance with Federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the Federal award.” This section goes on to provide that the internal controls should comply with the guidance in:

Read More

Topics: Government Regulations, Grants & Cooperative Agreements (2 CFR 200)